It could possibly be the first on but I’m not completely sure
You need to find out how many $ you gonna earn in 1 hours
175 divide 15=11.66
11.66x 18= 209.88
Answer:
<h3>For two events A and B show that P (A∩B) ≥ P (A)+P (B)−1.</h3>
By De morgan's law

which is Bonferroni’s inequality
<h3>Result 1: P (Ac) = 1 − P(A)</h3>
Proof
If S is universal set then

<h3>Result 2 : For any two events A and B, P (A∪B) = P (A)+P (B)−P (A∩B) and P(A) ≥ P(B)</h3>
Proof:
If S is a universal set then:

Which show A∪B can be expressed as union of two disjoint sets.
If A and (B∩Ac) are two disjoint sets then
B can be expressed as:

If B is intersection of two disjoint sets then

Then (1) becomes

<h3>Result 3: For any two events A and B, P(A) = P(A ∩ B) + P (A ∩ Bc)</h3>
Proof:
If A and B are two disjoint sets then

<h3>Result 4: If B ⊂ A, then A∩B = B. Therefore P (A)−P (B) = P (A ∩ Bc) </h3>
Proof:
If B is subset of A then all elements of B lie in A so A ∩ B =B
where A and A ∩ Bc are disjoint.

From axiom P(E)≥0

Therefore,
P(A)≥P(B)
Answer:
As x → -∞, f(x) → 0.5; as x → ∞, f(x) → 0.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Given function:

<u>Asymptote</u>: a line that the curve gets infinitely close to, but never touches.
As the degrees of the numerator and denominator of the given function are equal, there is a horizontal asymptote at
(where a is the leading coefficient of the numerator, and b is the leading coefficient of the denominator). This is the end behavior.

This is because as
the -7 of the numerator and the +8 of the denominator become negligible. Therefore, we are left with:

Therefore:


Answer:
See below.
Step-by-step explanation:
1/2 = shrink by a factor of 1/2.
+7 = moved up 7 units.