1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
madam [21]
3 years ago
13

In this activity, you'll be writing an essay evaluating the reasoning of the Supreme Court majority opinion and dissent in the c

ase of Tinker v. Des Moines. On what grounds did each group of justices support their opinions
Law
1 answer:
algol133 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The 1969 Supreme Court instance of Tinker v. Des Moines found that the right to speak freely of discourse must be ensured in government funded schools, gave the demonstration of articulation or conclusion—regardless of whether verbal or emblematic—isn't problematic to learning. The Court decided for Tinker, a 13-year-old young lady who wore dark armbands to class to fight America's inclusion in the Vietnam War.

Majority Opinion  

In Tinker v. Des Moines, a vote of 7–2 decided for Tinker, maintaining the option to free discourse inside a state funded school. Equity Fortas, composing for the majority feeling, expressed that "It can scarcely be contended that either understudies or educators shed their sacred rights to the right to speak freely of discourse or articulation at the school building door." Because the school couldn't show proof of critical unsettling influence or interruption made by the understudies' wearing of the armbands, the Court saw no motivation to confine their appearance of conclusion while the understudies were going to class. The majority likewise noticed that the school denied hostile to war images while it permitted images communicating different feelings, a training the Court thought about unlawful.

Dissenting Opinion  

Equity Hugo L. Dark contended in a dissenting conclusion that the First Amendment doesn't give the privilege to anybody to communicate any sentiment whenever. The school area was inside its privileges to train the understudies, and Black felt that the presence of the armbands occupied understudies from their work and thus brought down the capacity of the school authorities to play out their obligations. In his different difference, Justice John M. Harlan contended that school authorities ought to be managed wide power to keep up request except if their activities can be demonstrated to come from an inspiration other than a real school intrigue.

You might be interested in
Jack purchases a cola drink at a fast food chain, while drinking he determines the cola is a caustic drain cleaner. Jack may sue
Natali [406]

Answer:

breach of the implied of merchantability

Explanation:

Implied warrant of merchantability happens when an individual such as jack in this question, goes to buy a product that did not work as expected. In this case, Jack requested for a Cola drink which he bought and later realized it was caustic drain cleaner. The warranty guarantees that the cola drink gotten from the fast food chain must work according to why it was purchased and the sellers are not required to explain to jack that Cola drink is what he was going to get when buying the product from them because the law on its own, creates that warranty.

5 0
3 years ago
Forensic means _____ the forum
kaheart [24]
It comes from the Latin word "forensis" pertaining to a forum. ... The meaning of "forensic" later came to be restricted to refer to the courts of law. The word entered English usage in 1659.
5 0
3 years ago
HURRY ITS A QUIZ!!!!!!
Harman [31]
That would be a concurrent power
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The American court system is identified as an “______”
liubo4ka [24]

Option C is correct. United States uses the adversarial system in its courts. The opposing attorneys have responsibility for controlling presentation of lawsuit. Attorneys may not lie but have no duty to volunteer facts that don't support their client's case.

An impartial individual or group of people, typically a judge or jury, who try to ascertain the truth and pass judgement in accordance with it, is presented with two advocates presenting their parties' case or position under the adversarial system, also known as the adversary system, in common law countries.

Because it leaves less room for the state to be prejudiced against the defendant, advocates of the adversarial system frequently claim that it is more equitable and less prone to misuse than the inquisitional approach.

To know more about Adversarial system:

brainly.com/question/5921518

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
Complete each sentence using the drop-down menu.
den301095 [7]

Answer:

The Democratic Party

The Republican Party

The Green Party

Libertarians

Al Gore or electoral college one of those

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What resources are needed to set up or establish perimeter?
    5·1 answer
  • What are some way investigators are tracking down cyber criminals
    11·1 answer
  • Which is an example of an individual bioethical decision?
    11·1 answer
  • In 2014 the number of homicides was what percent of the total number of crimes reported
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER WILL GIVE MOST BRANLIST WHO ANSWER CORRECT!!
    8·1 answer
  • Interpreting Political Cartoons 1. Describe what is happening in the cartoon. 2. Hitler had absolute authority in Nazi Germany.
    8·1 answer
  • What is my life about?
    7·2 answers
  • Blood stains are found layered on top of each other at a crime scene. This means that more than one person was injured and bleed
    8·2 answers
  • In the United States, the states that do not utilize preliminary hearings schedule an arraignment date at the ________.
    14·1 answer
  • What does it mean to become a partner in a law firm.
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!