All categories

3 years ago

According to the distributive property, 6 (a + b) =

2 answers:

7 0

Its b

because this is how the distributive property works....
i'm going to use 2 and 4 for example
6(2+4)= 36 because you add 2 and 4(or a and b) then multiply by 6 because when using the distributive you use pemdas which is an abbreviation for parenthesis, exponents, multiplication, division, addition and subtraction and that is the order you do it in

o answer b you multiply 6 by a (or 2) then multiply 6 by b (or 4) after doing that you add them together and it equals 36 just like 6(2+4) (or 6(a+b)..)
and that is why it is b

Helen [10]3 years ago

6 0

The answer is option B. In the distributive property you need to multiply the constant that is outside of the parenthesis, with the terms that are inside :)

You might be interested in

| 3. Find the Area of the triangle. 8.6 yd 10.9 yd

Nitella [24]

Given:

The base of the triangle = 8.6 yd

The height of the triangle = 10.9 yd

To find the area of the triangle.

Formula

The area of a triangle with b as base and h as height is

$A=\frac{1}{2}bh$

Now,

Taking, b= 8.6 and h = 10.9 we get,

$A=\frac{1}{2}(8.6)(10.9)$ sq yd

or, $A= 46.87$ sq yd

Hence,

The area of the given triangle is 46.87 sq yd.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How do I work out this question ??

djyliett [7]

Well read the story part of your paragraph. You need to cut out all of the extra stuff and focus on how fast they are going. Then make a chart symbolizing this to find where they directly meet:) If you are able submit the chart with your answer

6 0

3 years ago

Please help on this one!!

worty [1.4K]

$\frac{2700 Joules}{60 sec} = 45 watts$

Answer: B

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can somebody please help me with work answer Pleaseee

liberstina [14]

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Prove the following DeMorgan's laws: if LaTeX: XX, LaTeX: AA and LaTeX: BB are sets and LaTeX: \{A_i: i\in I\} {Ai:i∈I} is a fam

MariettaO [177]

$X-(A\cup B)=(X-A)\cap(X-B)$

I'll assume the usual definition of set difference, $X-A=\{x\in X,x\not\in A\}$ .

Let $x\in X-(A\cup B)$ . Then $x\in X$ and $x\not\in(A\cup B)$ . If $x\not\in(A\cup B)$ , then $x\not\in A$ and $x\not\in B$ . This means $x\in X,x\not\in A$ and $x\in X,x\not\in B$ , so it follows that $x\in(X-A)\cap(X-B)$ . Hence $X-(A\cup B)\subset(X-A)\cap(X-B)$ .

Now let $x\in(X-A)\cap(X-B)$ . Then $x\in X-A$ and $x\in X-B$ . By definition of set difference, $x\in X,x\not\in A$ and $x\in X,x\not\in B$ . Since $x\not A,x\not\in B$ , we have $x\not\in(A\cup B)$ , and so $x\in X-(A\cup B)$ . Hence $(X-A)\cap(X-B)\subset X-(A\cup B)$ .

The two sets are subsets of one another, so they must be equal.

$X-\left(\bigcup\limits_{i\in I}A_i\right)=\bigcap\limits_{i\in I}(X-A_i)$

The proof of this is the same as above, you just have to indicate that membership, of lack thereof, holds for all indices $i\in I$ .

Proof of one direction for example:

Let $x\in X-\left(\bigcup\limits_{i\in I}A_i\right)$ . Then $x\in X$ and $x\not\in\bigcup\limits_{i\in I}A_i$ , which in turn means $x\not\in A_i$ for all $i\in I$ . This means $x\in X,x\not\in A_{i_1}$ , and $x\in X,x\not\in A_{i_2}$ , and so on, where $\{i_1,i_2,\ldots\}\subset I$ , for all $i\in I$ . This means $x\in X-A_{i_1}$ , and $x\in X-A_{i_2}$ , and so on, so $x\in\bigcap\limits_{i\in I}(X-A_i)$ . Hence $X-\left(\bigcup\limits_{i\in I}A_i\right)\subset\bigcap\limits_{i\in I}(X-A_i)$ .

4 0

3 years ago