Answer: Woodson v North Carolina and Roberts v Lousianna
Explanation:
In Boykin v. Alabama (1969), the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the death penalty for the first time.
By 1972, Furman v. Georgia ruled a Georgia death penalty law was cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. In 1976 there were five "Death Penalty Cases". While Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, and Proffitt v. Florida, confirmed the states´ death penalties, Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana overturned the mandatory death sentences.
Answer:
Online Cruelty takes places when a person uses digital tools such as mobile phones and internet to harass or upset someone, often repeatedly.
Such people behave thoughtlessly and cruelly.
It harms a person's mental well being and health.
It can encourage other people to carry out physical attack as cruelty threatens a persons physical integrity.
<u><em>The family members and friends of the target are likely to be affected by the behavioral changes in the target.</em></u>
Answer:
You let the dog go because he's a service dog that's taking advantage of the dog and what if your dog got hurt.
Explanation:
This law is unlikely to be constitutional.
The Miranda warning is a type of notification that is given to criminal suspects who are in custody. This warning advises them of their right to remain silent, and that they are allowed to refuse answering questions or providing information to authorities. A case precedent that would support this instance is <em>Berkemer v. McCarty (1984)</em>. In this case, it was established that a person stopped, even for a misdemeanour, should receive the protections of the Fifth Amendment once in custody, regardless of how serious the offense is.
