Answer:
There is no limit to the number of objections
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Low-level employees engaging in stock fraud
Explanation:
A: The reason A is an incorrect option is because the question specifically refers to employees of the company. Meaning that interference by outsiders does not count as embezzlement.
C: This option is incorrect because this option involves company owners, which does not refer to low-level employees, and therefore is incorrect.
D: Also does not refer to low-level employees due to the referencing to upper-level management.
Three student readings open up new avenues for discussion and inquiry. A concluding activity proposes student inquiry into arguments for and against capital punishment through internet investigation and a "constructive controversy."
