I am pretty sure the answer is B, that is what I would do.
Answer:
<em>Patton v. Mid-Continent Systems, Inc.</em>
Explanation:
In the framework of Patton v. Mid-Continent Systems, Inc. case (1988), Patton, and others as plaintiffs, on the one hand, and Mid-Continent Systems as the defendant entered into franchising contract. The Mid-Continent Systems were obliged to franchise truck stops run only by Patton, and others. Meanwhile, <u>the defendant violated the contract by franchising truck stops of other providers. </u>
As a result, the court decided that the plaintiff was to be awarded <em>compensatory damages</em>, and an additional $2,250,000 in <em>punitive damages</em>.
Answer:
Ethical communication is fundamental to thoughtful decision-making and responsible thinking. ... Lack of ethical communication leads others to question your professional and personal integrity and to wonder if they can trust your message, or even trust you.
Did you republicans? Well, anyways, i believe it's "scalawags."
Scalawags - a white Southerner who collaborated with northern Republicans during Reconstruction, often for personal profit. The term was used derisively by white Southern Democrats who opposed Reconstruction legislation.
