Answer:
Exculpatory evidence
Explanation:
Exculpatory evidence -
It is the evidence , which act in favor of the defendant during the trial process , is referred to as exculpatory evidence.
It is the exactly reverse of the inculpatory evidence.
Hence, from the given information of the question, the correct term for the given information of the question is - Exculpatory evidence.
Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court affected the US citizens' right to freedom of speech.
Explanation:
Charles Schenck was the general secretary of the US Social Party. Socialists were against the world war that was occurring at the time since they believed that the US involvement only benefited the rich. The poor soldiers were the ones who were sent to fight. As a result, socialists also urged US workers to oppose the war. Schenck participated in many anti war activities and he mailed leaflets to soldiers trying to convince them of resisting the draft. As he violated the Espionage Act, because he caused insubordination in the military forces, he was convicted. However, after being tried, Schenck argued that his right to freedom of speech protected by the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution had been violated. The Espionage Act limited the freedom of speech in times of war. For the Court, Schenck's actions had put other people at risk. As a result, in wartime reasonable limits can be put the 1st Amendment's provision governing freedom of speech.
Answer:
Baman Tribikram
Explanation:
A sculpture of Baman Tribikram erected by Lichchhavi king Man Dev is considered to be the oldest sculpture in Nepal. Sculptures that were created during the Licchchhavi period include ones of Palanchowk Bhagawati, Budhanilkantha, etc.
A.) Rwanda. I can not explain exactly why this took place in Rwanda but they even have a movie on the conflict between the Tutsi and Hutu tribes. Everything in the movie took place in Rwanda.
