Answer:
b) Nothing, because you are already minimizing cost
Explanation:
cost of producing one additional unit by hiring more workers = $10 / 50 units = $0.20 per unit
cost of producing one additional unit by buying the machine = $200 / 1,000 units = $0.20 per unit
Since labor exhibits a diminishing return, the next unit of labor will produce less than 50 units. This means that if you want to increase production, you should buy the machine.
Using the same logic, the previous units of labor were able to produce more than 50 units, which means that the average total cost was lower using labor than the machine. So if the company's concern is to minimize costs, then they are already doing so.
Answer:
Kevin has analyzed the situation well. However, he should also consider the fact that he saved $10 by only purchasing the shirt.
Opportunity cost is the cost of the forgone alternative. Out of the 3 choices, he only purchased 1 of the choices, the opportunity cost are the other two choices. However, he is still capable of buying the flip-flops costing $10 but he chose not to do so. He should consider it as a savings aside from it being a lost opportunity.
Answer:
b) false
Explanation:
In the case of theory that developed by MM in this the investor have no need for concering with respect to the dividend policy of the company as in this the sell option is there with regard to the equity portfolio when they need the cash
So according to the given situation, the given statement is false
hence the option b is correct
Answer: The whole of $7,500 moving expenses
Explanation:Mike Hansen is entitled to the deduction of $7,500 moving expenses from his adjusted gross income.
The IRS now allows employees to deduct any moving expenses incurred by them to be deducted from their adjusted gross income before taxation.
Because people are desperate lol
