Answer:
-9.92%
Explanation:
P₀ = Div₁ / (Re - g)
- Div₁ = next year's expected dividend = $1.12 x (1 - 11.5%) = $0.9912
- Re = cost of equity = ?
- P₀ = current stock price = $62.91
- g = dividend's growth rate = -11.5%
Re = (Div₁ / P₀) + g
Re = ($0.9912 / $62.91) - 11.5%
Re = 1.58% - 11.5% = -9.92%
Since the cost of equity or required rate of return cannot be negative, I suppose that investors are not worried about Abbott distributing dividends, instead, they prefer that the company reinvests earnings in new projects.
Answer:
a practice that may have longer term implications on the ethics of personal privacy
Explanation:
Cookies are a tool that is used on websites to identify user browser history.
The information on a user's browsing habits is then used by businesses to tailor display information relevant to what they are usually interested in.
Usually they are a safe way to improve browsing experience, but they can be used by criminals to spy on people and gain unwanted access to their data.
Cookies save information about a user session by storing data like usernames.
There is a long term danger of having one's browsing history tracked without their consent
Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
Answer:
Explanation:
Year-end plan assets were $4,250,000
At the beginning of the year, plan assets were $3,974,000
So Actual Return on Plan Assets = (4,250,000 - 3,974,000) - (420,000 - 365,000)
Actual Return on Plan Assets = 276,000 - (55,000)
Actual Return on Plan Assets = 221,000
In making the best economic choices, consumers compare the benefits of the choice to the cost of the choice.
<h3>
How to make the best economic choices?</h3>
In making the best economic choices, the costs of the choice should be compared with the benefits of the choice. The choice should only be made when the benefits of making the choice exceeds the cost of the choice.
To learn more about costs, please check: brainly.com/question/14915288
#SPJ1
