Answer:
Grace is incorrect because of the veil and alter ego theory
Explanation:
In this scenario Grace formed a corporation along with her three friends. As a result of catering services offered guest became ill and sued Grace and the other owners for damages.
According to the alter egos theory personal liability can be invoked on the owners of a corporation or its limited liability members.
Alter ego theory is used to penetrate the corporate veil that protects shareholders. Personal liability can be assigned on the business owner as it is in this case against Grace and the other owners.
Capital gains representative select industrial
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: Diseconomies of scales.
Explanation:
To begin with, the concept known as <em>''diseconomies of scales''</em>, in the field of economics and management, refers to the situation where an organization finds itself in problems due to the fact that a large production is being produced by them and the coordination and management of that large production is beginning to cause trouble and that impacts in the fact that the company will produce good or services with an increase in the cost per unit of the products.
This is what a customer pays if he or she travels less than a block (for example) and charges mind and decide to get off can. Then after at every additional mile travelled the $2.80 per mile applies.
Answer:
No, because the second method has lower total costs of production.
Explanation:
In a bid to make profits businesses must always compare different processes and choose the cheapest one.
This will eventually reflect in the profitability of the business.
In this instance let's get the cost of each process.
Fabric costs $110 a bolt and labor costs $20 an hour.
The first dress maker can sew 400 garments with 100 bolts of fabric and 1,500 hours of labour
Total cost = (100 bolts * 110) + (1500 * 20)
Total cost = $41,000
For the second dress maker he can sew 400 garments with 150 bolts of fabric and 1,000 hours of identical labour
Total cost = (150 *110) + (1000 * 20)
Total cost = $36,500
As can be seen the second dressmaker has a lower cost of production so he is more efficient than the first dress maker
