1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Darina [25.2K]
4 years ago
7

A landowner in fee simple signed a promissory note for $10,000 to a bank, and secured the note by a mortgage of her land to the

bank. The mortgage was duly recorded. The landowner then sold the property to an attorney, who assumed and agreed to pay the mortgage to the bank on the land. The attorney did not make payments on the mortgage note to the bank. The bank, following appropriate statutory procedures, foreclosed the mortgage and gave notice to both the landowner and the attorney that it intended to sue for any deficiency. At the foreclosure sale, the property sold for $6,000. The bank now sues both the landowner and the attorney for $5,000, which is the remaining amount of the unpaid principal and interest on the note plus costs of foreclosure.Against which party will the bank be successful in obtaining a judgment?response - correctA Only the landowner.B Only the attorney.C Either the landowner or the attorney.D Both the landowner and the attorney.
Business
1 answer:
iren [92.7K]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D) Both the landowner and the attorney.

Explanation:

The bank will succeed in obtaining a judgement against both the former landowner and the attorney. The bank can sue either of them or both of them, but it can only collect the $5,000 once.

  • When the attorney assumed the mortgage, he expressly promised to pay it. The lender becomes a third party beneficiary of the attorney's promise to pay and can sue him if the mortgage isn't paid.
  • The former landowner became secondarily liable to the lender in case the attorney didn't pay.

You might be interested in
Zipcar: Creating Value in the Marketplace Zipcar: Creating Value in the Marketplace Nearly a decade ago, the founders of Zipcar
natta225 [31]

Complete Question

The complete question is shown on the first , second, third, fourth and fifth uploaded image

Answer:

1a

  The correct option is  C

1b

    The correct option is  D

1c

  The correct option is  C

1d

  The correct option is  C

Explanation:

1a. Zipcar is an example of what type of market...

Answer: value-based marketing

1b. Zipcar's goal is to have an available... Zipcar's goal is to have an available zipcar located within 10-15 minutes of its members. This is an example of what component of the marketing mix?

 Answer:Place

1c  Zipcar traditionally focused on marketing t... Zipcar traditionally focused on marketing toward individuals without cars as a convenient form of alternative transportation. Zipcar has now begun to also focus its marketing toward businesses and organizations to use Zipcar for their employees. This is an example of

  Answer: B2B marketing

1d

  1d. Which of the following statements about Zipcar illust... Which of the following statements about Zipcar illustrates how marketing can help to enrich society  

Answer: One of Zipcar's core mission is to "change the world through urban and environmental transformation"

8 0
3 years ago
The following stockholders' equity accounts were taken from the balance sheet of LAH Corporation as of December 31, 2019 Common
Blizzard [7]

Answer:

1) 30,000 shares issued

2) Common stock average price: 12.1 dollars

   book value: $ 22.49

3)  135,000 dividends to common stockholders

Explanation:

1) preferred stock equity $ 3,000,000 / $ 100 par value = 30,000 shares issued

2)

common stock: 400,000 issued x $10 face value : 4,000,000

additional paid-in in excess of par value:                    840,000

                                                total paid-in                4,840,000

average common stock price: $ 4,840,000/400,000 shares = 12.1

on average common stock were issued at 12.1 dollars

common stock book value:

(common stock + retained earnings - preferred stock)/outstanding shares

(4,840,000 + 4,260,000 - 105,000)/ 400,000 = 22.4875

3) if 450,000 dividends are distributed:

the compamy will first pay the preferred stocks:

30,000 x $ 100 x 7% =  210,000

dividends in arrears:     105,000

 total preferred stock   315,000

bond to common stock:

450,000 declared - 315,000 preferred stock: 135,000 for common stock

4 0
3 years ago
What are important information that is needed before you create a PowerPoint presentation
mr_godi [17]
How to copy and paste and be creative
5 0
3 years ago
Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%. a.
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

a. The answers are as follows:

(i) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 4%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0

(ii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 6.25%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.25

(iii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 8.50%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.50

(iv) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 10.75%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.75

(v) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 13%; and Beta of Portfolio = 1.0

b. Change in expected return = 9% increase

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as part b of it is omitted. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%.

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

The explanation to the answers are now provided as follows:

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

To calculate these, we use the following formula:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (WS&P * RS&P) + (WT * RT) ………… (1)

Beta of Portfolio = (WS&P * BS&P) + (WT * BT) ………………..………………. (2)

Where;

WS&P = Weight of S&P = (1) – (1v)

RS&P = Return of S&P = 13%, or 0.13

WT = Weight of T-bills = 1 – WS&P

RT = Return of T-bills = 4%, or 0.04

BS&P = 1.0

BT = 0

After substituting the values into equation (1) & (2), we therefore have:

(i) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0 (i.e. WS&P = 0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0) * 0.04) = 0.04, or 4%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0) * 0) = 0

(ii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.25 (i.e. WS&P = 0.25)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.25 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0.04) = 0.0625, or 6.25%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.25 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0) = 0.25

(iii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.50 (i.e. WS&P = 0.50)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.50 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0.04) = 0.0850, or 8.50%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.50 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0) = 0.50

(iv) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.75 (i.e. WS&P = 0.75)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.75 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0.04) = 0.1075, or 10.75%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.75 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0) = 0.75

(v) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 1.0 (i.e. WS&P = 1.0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (1.0 * 0.13) + ((1 – 1.0) * 0.04) = 0.13, or 13%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (1.0 * 1.0) + (1 – 1.0) * 0) = 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

There expected return will increase by the percentage of the difference between Expected Return and Risk free rate. That is;

Change in expected return = Expected Return - Risk free rate = 13% - 4% = 9% increase

4 0
3 years ago
With the availability of
Elenna [48]

Answer:

Why or why not? Yes, organizing is still a very important managerial function because work is separated, assembled, and coordinated with the help of organizing. Therefore allowing employees to work anywhere, anytime. Also, people still need to plan what to do at what time so as to ensure time maximation.

Credits to : assignmentexpert

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The stock price of company x doubled over the past year, the stock price of company z decreased by over 50%. if the market is ef
    9·1 answer
  • Portia grant is an employee who is paid monthly. for the month of january of the current year, she earned a total of $8,260. the
    9·1 answer
  • A strategic plan is primarily designed​ to:A. provide the answer to all the​ organization's problems.B. provide input to the str
    7·2 answers
  • One important distinguishing feature of valid arguments is that __________.
    7·1 answer
  • Nadine’s Home Fashions has $2.12 million in net working capital. The firm has fixed assets with a book value of $31.64 million a
    8·1 answer
  • The following items could appear on a bank reconciliation:
    15·1 answer
  • 25-6. Which of the following is a fundamental distinguishing feature of individual income taxes compared with payroll taxes? a.
    7·1 answer
  • Does anyone’s else’s teacher do this and does not let you complete the test-
    6·1 answer
  • French mining engineer Henri Fayol defined management as a process involving which of the following?
    10·2 answers
  • If $25,000 of fixed costs will be eliminated by discontinuing the Sporty line, how will operating income be affected
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!