Answer:
Uhm I wouldnt text him but that's just me
Explanation:
Michael would argue that Ramses the Second died of causes that are not to be known as it is impossible to figure them out.
Explanation:
Bruno Latour is known for his work in the studies in the filed of science and technology studies. However, his study of the practice of science was indeed at one time associated with the post truth and social constructionist movements and approaches.
Michael to take a constructionist stance would be to assume that it is impossible for such a statement to be made regarding an ancient King on the basis of meager evidence for his tuberculosis.
So he would insist that it cannot be known how he died.
Answer:
RETROACTIVE INTERFERENCE
Explanation:
There are two kinds of retroactive interference. Proactive and retroactive. Janice falls under the proactive category. Proactive interference suggests that previously learned skill affects a new skill. Having learned French in the morning, she could not effectively articulate the Spanish that was learned in the afternoon.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is FALSE that Jeremy Bentham and the rest of the utilitarians believe that the principle of utility should be applied to humans only, excluding the animals.
This is evident when Jeremy Bentham and other utilitarians argued that Principal of Utility is based on the belief that the action of individuals is good in as much it leads to the happiness of the individual involved.
And the application of the principle of utility to animals (other than human) is sufficient only if during the exploitation of animals, the animals experience happiness more than pain.
