Probable answer that you're seeking: Many Europeans saw Napoleon and his armies as foreign oppressors and fought back to save their countries.
Further detail:
Explanation:
As Napoleon's armies conquered other territories in Europe, he arranged new governmental districts that didn't align with previous territorial boundaries. He did this so as to take away local and regional loyalties, trying to make all the conquered territories into departments of the French empire.
A good example of Napoleon's conquests sparking nationalism in the conquered regions would be the various German lands. The German territories had been divided into hundreds of different kingdoms and principalities and independent cities. Napoleon grouped them together into a number of administrative departments for his own purposes. German territories that had always maintained much separation from each other now were grouped together in ways that made them work with each other. And guess what? One of the biggest things they wanted to work on was getting rid of French occupation of their territories. So in the long run, Napoleon's strategy backfired. It helped to promote German nationalism, and in the following century, the German territories banded together to defeat France and establish the German Empire.
Napoleon impacted both Europe and the world in a number of ways. When thinking about Napoleon’s impact, we have to realize that he did not necessarily intend to have the impacts that he did. Instead, much of his impact came about inadvertently or even in response to his actions.
One of the biggest impacts that Napoleon had was that he caused a major backlash against his ideas and against the prospect that a single country...
Answer: Comparing the Foreign Policy Doctrines of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. The third section elucidates the George W. Bush foreign policy doctrine. As postulated by Campbell, President Clinton had no authority.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the British Victory in the war came with a lot of war debt, which Britain taxed the colonies in order to pay off--eventually leading to the colonists' rebellion. </span></span>
