William Shakespeare, born in England in 1564 and died 1616, was an English writer who became known as the father of English literature. Through his many poems, plays, comedies, tragedies, dramas, etc, Shakespeare showed his enormous ability and his deep interest in expressing, through writing, his reflections, perceptions, observations and ideas on different issues of everyday life. Among the many things Shakespeare was known for, was his use of different language techniques to establish a difference between not just his ideals, but also people that he wrote about from his time. In particular, he tended to use a combination of prose and verse in his writings and used them to set differences of hierarchy, social status and even intelligence, especially in his characters. Thus, it has been known that Shakespeare usually used prose when his lesser characters, those who were lower-born and less educated, spoke, acted, or thought, while he used free verse for higher-born and more educated ones. This is because verse was more complex, it had rythm and meter and it established social status, and level of education, which indicated a higher birth, and thus, it was understood, these characters were better prepared for the use of such complex language.
Answer:
Containment.
Explanation:
The policy of containment is a foreign policy proposed by the government under the Presidency of Harry S. Truman to limit the powers of the Soviet Union and its spread of communism after World War II in 1947. This policy was a reply to the Soviet Union when it started to expand its communist control in Eastern Europe and Asia. The idea of containment policy was to make countries well-off enough to avoid the lure of the Soviet Union. It provided support for countries that rejected communism. Americans fought on the sides of the nationalists to try to stop the spread of communists.
Answer:
B- on the recommendation of Congress
Answer:
No Clear Consensus
Explanation:
Some scholars believe it translates to "River of Death" but there is no clear winner on the translation of Chickamauga.
Answer:
If I lived in a economy in which production, investment, prices, and incomes are determined centrally by a government it would change my life in a lot of different ways. The first way it would be different is I would be paid differently. That could have drastic consequences on my income and investments. I also might not be able to find all the commodities or goods that you would normally be able to find in a market economy. If for some reason I wanted to buy some luxury items: fancy bed, new expensive clothes and such then the state would say no because those items are not needed to survive. Therefore my life would be different in that way. all in all living in this kind of economy would become very different then my current lifestyle
Explanation:
For the other answerer if you highlight the previous answer with the mouse and then right click it the press copy you can paste it on here using ctrl v
