1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
siniylev [52]
3 years ago
10

Stacy purchased a stock last year and sold it today for $4 a share more than her purchase price. She received a total of $1.15 p

er share in dividends. Which one of the following statements is correct in relation to this investment?
A. The dividend yield is expressed as a percentage of the selling price.
B. The capital gains yield is positive.
C. The capital gain would have been less had Stacy not received the dividends.
D. The dividend yield is greater than the capital gains yield.
E. The total dollar return per share is $3.
Business
1 answer:
dusya [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: B. The capital gains yield is positive.

Explanation:

The Capital Gains Yield is a percentage figure that tells how much an investment has increased in price from it's acquisition.

It works by taking the new value and dividing it by the original value.

Using Stacy as an example, the Stock increased by $4 so assuming she bought the stock for even $0.1 then her Capital Yield is,

= 4/0.1

= 40 * 100%

= 4000% which is positive

As long as the stock was sold for more than it was bought, Capital Yield Gain is positive.

You might be interested in
Bankston Corporation forecasts that if all of its existing financial policies are followed, its proposed capital budget would be
Reil [10]

Answer:<em> Option (E) is correct.</em>

From the given option, the following will reduce Bankston's need to issue new common stock: <em>Increase the percentage of debt in the target capital structure.</em>

With an increase in percentage of debt , there will be a proportional increase in cost of equity and thereby decreasing investment in equity. This will therefore reduce Bankston's need to issue new common stock

6 0
3 years ago
A human resources department could assume the staffing function of management. <br> True <br> False
777dan777 [17]
The answer is True
hope it helps!
4 0
3 years ago
How does the use of new technology in industry benefit producers more so than consumers?
katen-ka-za [31]

The use of new technology in industry has benefited producers more so than consumers as, "Producers can transport goods around the world."

With faster decision-making and quick responses, the new technology enables producers to become more competitive in the market. The technology is helping to increase the efficiency of systems, products and services.

With the help of technology, the products which are produced are being marketed and then they are being transported around the world. This way it enables the business to grow rapidly and increases the profits.

Through the use of technology, businesses can research the market. This is extremely useful as it provides businesses with in-depth knowledge about market conditions.

Hence, the use of new technology in industry has benefited producers more so than consumers.

To learn more about the producers and consumers here:

brainly.com/question/7103791

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
Planet Resource Inc. is a global internet company that offers country-specific variations of its sites, keeping in mind the ling
ddd [48]

Answer:

D) reduce its cultural distance from the other countries.

3 0
3 years ago
Dr. Tanaka was served with a malpractice lawsuit based on allegedly removing the wrong organ. Following discovery, it becomes cl
lord [1]

The lawyer should make a motion for summary judgment.

<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>

A motion for summary judgement can be considered as a request that is made to the court for ruling other party that it has no case since there were no facts on the case. When the party makes the motion, it claims that the jury must rule in the moving party's side or the case should not move before a jury.  

A party can involve in filing a motion for summary judgment when the party feels that there are no facts in the case or problem. In the example given, there exists no evidence against the doctor and hence no jury can rule in favor of the plaintiff. Thus, the Doctor's lawyer should make a motion for summary judgment.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • You have been a BCBA for over 5 years and decide to take on some additional work in the evening, supervising students seeking ho
    13·1 answer
  • Brian has just finished college. He wants to set up a small business to make and sell fireworks. He registers his company and ac
    15·2 answers
  • How does inertia affect a person who is not wearing a seatbelt during a collision?
    7·2 answers
  • What are the advantages of a bank savings account?
    10·2 answers
  • The Consumer Products Division of Mickolick Corporation had average operating assets of $510,000 and net operating income of $42
    10·1 answer
  • Baka Corporation applies manufacturing overhead on the basis of direct labor-hours. At the beginning of the most recent year, th
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is correct?
    14·1 answer
  • George purchased a futures contract at 349. The contract is on 2500 units, requires a 10% margin deposit and is priced in cents
    12·1 answer
  • What is another term for the buying and selling of stocks?
    14·2 answers
  • what happens when the price of a good increases holding everything else constant? producer surplus decreases consumer surplus de
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!