Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
According to the law of diminishing marginal productivity, if there is an increase in the input in the production of a certain commodity then as a result there is an increase in the output of that commodity, initially but further increase in the input will have no impact on the output of the commodity or will have a negative impact.
In our case, when farmer hires 3rd worker, the output increases by 1,400(4,400-3,000) bushels. According to the law of diminishing marginal productivity, if he hires 4 workers then there is an increase in the output but less than the 1,400 bushels.
This condition will be satisfied in the option (a), where output increases by 1,200 bushels.
Rules for Admission to the Bar
The Rules for Admission to the Bar have been updated as of July 1, 2017. A complete listing of rules can be downloaded in PDF format. Or, browse Rules by section using the links below.
1. Purpose
2. Definitions and Due Date Provisions
3. State Board of Law Examiners
4. General Requirements for Admission
5. Standards for Admission
6. Admission by Examination
7. Admission Without Examination
8. Admission by Temporary License for Legal Services Programs
9. Admission by Temporary House Counsel License
10. Admission by House Counsel License
11. License for Foreign Legal Consultants
12. Fees
13. Immunity
14. Confidentiality and Release of Information
15. Adverse Determinations and Hearings
16. Conditional Admission
17. Appeal to the Supreme Court
18. Reapplication
19. Bar Admissions Advisory Council
Answer: Decrease
Explanation:
What makes return on investment fantastic is when production and sales is on a steady increase, as production increases and sales follow there after, there would be an increase in return on investment because the increase in sales would make room for expansion giving the business more profit, but in the scenario where raw materials are not promising, there would be a decrease in production overtime and which would also lead to a decrease in return on investment.
The answer is selecting an alternative. It is because it is
not always satisfying or a guarantee of using an alternative in the stage of
managerial decision making process because sometimes it won’t suit or will be
helpful in solving the problem.
Answer:
EOQ= 300 units
Annual ordering cost= $3750
Annual holding cost =$3750
Re-order point =100 units
Explanation:
The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is the order size that minimizes the balance of ordering cost and holding cost. At the EOQ, the carrying cost is equal to the holding cost.
It is computed using he formulae below
EOQ = √ (2× Co× D)/Ch
EOQ = √ (2× 75× 15,000)/25
EOQ = 300 units
Annual holding cost
= EOQ/2 × holding cost per unit
= 300/2 × $25
=$3750
Annual ordering cost
= Annul demand/EOQ × ordering cost per order
=( 15,000/300)× $75
= $3750
Re-order Point
Maximum consumption × maximum lead time
=( 15,000/300)× 2 = 100 units
