1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
antoniya [11.8K]
2 years ago
13

How did the white colonists fell about freedom

History
1 answer:
sergey [27]2 years ago
4 0

Unhappy, because the Britains needed money to pay for its war debts.

You might be interested in
What are the traditional Chinese cultures?
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

chines wearing hanfu I like

it when I go to China hanfu

is so good I like it like hanbok

in Korea

3 0
1 year ago
The FBI's uniform crime report and publication, crime in the United States, divides crimes into which two categories?
Nataly [62]
Crime is divided into Criminal Law and Civil Law
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. Think of the women's rights initiative you described. How does the initiative reflect the social reality and traditional valu
ss7ja [257]

Answer:

Our flagship World Development

Report 2012 demonstrated that gender equality and economic development are inextricably linked. It showed

that equality not only guarantees basic

rights but also plays a vital role in promoting the robust, shared growth needed to end

extreme poverty in our increasingly competitive, globalized world. The persistent constraints and deprivations that prevent many

of the world’s women from achieving their

potential have huge consequences for individuals, families, communities, and nations.

The 2012 report recognized that expanding

women’s agency—their ability to make decisions and take advantage of opportunities—

is key to improving their lives as well as the

world we all share.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What four things should you look for when analyzing sources in history?
skad [1K]

When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources--whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies--that people from that period left behind.

Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.

In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:

1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?

2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author's message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?

3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?

4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?

5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person's eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?

6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author's choice of words tell you? What about the silences--what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

1. Is it prescriptive--telling you what people thought should happen--or descriptive--telling you what people thought did happen?

2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?

3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of "ordinary" people? From whose perspective?

4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?

5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?

6. If we have read other historians' interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

Remember, you cannot address each and every one of these questions in your presentation or in your paper, and I wouldn't want you to.



hope it helps

7 0
3 years ago
What British possession became the strongest center of christianity of the west indies
vaieri [72.5K]
In 1788, the colonization of Austria began ... * ahem * Australia
In Europe, meanwhile, one Cake raged. As a result of the war, Great Britain captured the Ionian Islands, Malta, Seychelles, Mauritius, Saint Lucia, Tobago; Trinidad was taken from Spain, Guyana and the Cape colony from the Netherlands.
In Asia, Britain had the goal of spreading its influence in India and China.
The British ruled India with the help of the East India Company, and for a long time it was effective. Moreover, the principalities are governed by locals who are subordinate to the British (if that has always been a hired army. You never know)
However, everything comes to an end. Namely: in 1858, these mercenaries decided to set up a bund.
The riot was suppressed, the problem is different. Who to trust now?
So the British thought and established direct control over India, thereby laying the foundation for British India. In 1858, Queen Victoria was crowned as Empress of India.
In China, they traded in drugs. So what? It may be mean, but how else to get at least something from this China?
Only the Chinese did not really like it. Because of what the Opium Wars began. As a result of the first, Britain received the island of Hong Kong in 1842.
Let's dig into Russia for a minute. What is she? Yes ... ... The Persians and the Ottomans only win ... And they may invade India.
“If a fight is inevitable - hit first”, Britain thought, and hit ... No, not Russia (it will be a little later), but Afghanistan. But Britain did not succeed (yes, and it happens).
Later, Britain and Russia will fight for Afghanistan, but no one will conquer it.
In Africa, there were conflicts with the Boers - former residents of the Cape Colony, who were driven out by the British. The Boers founded their own states, which the British tried to capture, but they succeeded only in 1902
In 1869, the Suez Canal was founded.
In the 1880s, Egypt came under British control (although not direct).
In the same 1880s, Europeans began to colonize Africa. And who, if not Britain, will not join the sharing.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which factor played a major role in the decline of the Ottoman Empire?
    13·2 answers
  • A civil rights activist who was shot and killed because of his efforts to register African American voters was
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following was part of Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points?
    5·2 answers
  • Texas has more _______ than any other state. A. counties B. people C. schools
    12·2 answers
  • To what extent did the role of the federal government change under President Theodore Roosevelt in regard to TWO of the followin
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Song artists prefer paintings that depicted tiny human figures surrounded by sweeping, vast landscapes?
    5·1 answer
  • Neo-pluralism theory and elite theory are similar to each other in that both believe that
    10·1 answer
  • many people in the united states and europe held protests related to Rosenbergs trial because they thought that the Rosenbergs
    12·2 answers
  • Unit Test Review
    14·1 answer
  • +50points will mark brainliest to who answers all 3 thanks
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!