Science cannot describe things that are moral truth.
Answer:
<em>The concept of "Human Nature" is the believe that there are some naturally existing ways that human naturally think, feel and act</em>. The idea is that some of these attribute are innate to the human species and that it defines humanity and what it means to be human. However, some of the challenges put forward by anti-fundamentalists like the philosopher David L. Hull is<em> the temporal and contingent rarity of this "essential sameness of human being" in biology</em>. Other scientific basis of the inherent human behavior like <em>Instinctual behavior and other complex behavior as observed has also been known to be malleable and not fixed as opposed to the fundamentalist that argue that this inner human nature is the same and fixed</em>.
Yes, I do agree with the challenges.
I agree with this challenges from the fact that the idea of what it means to be human is diverse and different across culture, people and even the individual. <em>Some culture promote and encourage hostility as a way of defending and expanding itself, while others see this act as inhumane</em>, and some people do not see themselves as deviants because of their believe that they are exercising their human nature. some other basis is upbringing. <em>A child isolated from the rest of the world and groomed into a specific nature will retain that nature, which shouldn't be so if the internal human natures exists and is as dominant as fundamentalists of this idea claim.</em>
While the Eastern European countries have a shared history of socialism for varying periods of time, there are strong social, economic, and philosophical differences. In addition, the Eastern European reforms have been affected by the individual countries’ recent histories from 1989 onward as well as their socialist pasts.
Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus in the Western CIS still do not have a legal and policy framework that adequately allows for private land ownership, private farms, or efficient land transactions. They are still struggling over what the role of the state should be in relation to agricultural land use and productivity. The state has firm control of agricultural land and there is not enough political will to prevail over the former communists who oppose private ownership and sale of agricultural land.
I hope this helps
Based on the socio-political system, in addition to gerrymandering, a significant reason why so many members of Congress are elected from "safe" districts is "<u>the natural geographic clustering of people who share a political ideology."</u>
The demographic analysis has shown that people of the same political ideology tend to stay together in the same geographical area.
One of the reasons is that people living in the same geographical area share similar issues, such as social infrastructures.
Another reason is that people can easily influence one another when they stay in the same locality, increasing the clustering of people who share a political ideology.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>the natural geographic clustering of people who share a political ideology."</u>
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/18989033