Answer:
Margarita has an internal locus of control and would rate high on the conscientiousness dimension of personality.
Explanation:
An internal locus of control, opposed to an external locus of control, is the belief that one controls one's own destiny, that the decisions we make have the power to change our lives, therefore, we have the power to achieve what we want and to control what happens to us in the future. A person with an internal locus of control believes that there is no God or external entity controling people's life.
The conscientiousness dimension of personality is a personality trait that describes a person who is capable of self-regulation and self-discipline, who has goals and focuses actions and decisions towards those goals. People with high conscientousness tend to be very responsible and therefore, they are described as reliable and hardworking by others.
Answer:
The Jazz Age was a cultural period and movement that took place in America during the 1920s from which both new styles of music and dance emerged. Largely credited to African Americans employing new musical techniques along with traditional African traditions, jazz soon expanded to America's white middle class.
Answer:
According to this definition, the presence of a psychological disorder is signaled by significant disturbances in thoughts, feelings, and behaviors; these disturbances must reflect some kind of dysfunction (biological, psychological, or developmental).
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
Explanation:
By exercising its power to determine the constitutionality of federal and state government actions, the Supreme Court has developed a large body of judicial decisions, or “precedents,” interpreting the Constitution. How the Court uses precedent to decide controversial issues has prompted debate over whether the Court should follow rules identified in prior decisions or overrule them. The Court’s treatment of precedent implicates longstanding questions about how the Court can maintain stability in the law by adhering to precedent under the doctrine of stare decisis while correcting decisions that rest on faulty reasoning, unworkable standards, abandoned legal doctrines, or outdated factual assumptions.
