The answer is D. It reduced their risk when cotton prices were low.
Answer:
Ben would pay more in taxes.
Explanation:
A progressive income tax increases the tax rate as the taxpayer earns more money.
In this case, Ben would be taxed as earnings $60,000 which is probably a much higher tax rate than the applicable one for $30,000. If we use the current tax brackets for 2020, Ben would fall under the 22% tax bracket while both Cathy and Dylan would fall under the 12% tax bracket. Obviously Ben would pay much more in taxes.
Answer:
$1,901,385
Explanation:
First unit produced by lambda took 5,000 hours to produce and required $30,000 worth of materials and equipment usage.
The second unit took 4,500 hours and used $24,000 worth of materials and equipment usage.
learning rate = time needed to produce second unit / time needed to produce first unit = 4,500 hours / 5,000 hours = 90%
materials and equipment usage rate = $24,000 / $30,000 = 80%
using the attached table of cumulative values, we can determine the cumulative improvement factors needed to solve this question:
Olsan's accumulated cost for producing 20 more guidance controls
-
work hours = 4,500 x 14.61 (90% and 20 units) x $25 per hour = $1,643,625
- materials and equipment = $24,000 x 10.74 (95% and 20 units) = $257,760
- total = $1,901,385
Answer:
$ 6,600
Explanation:
Monty should
e up to
in the gross account but to an extent of the tax benefit in the previous year. Since the debt is a non-business debt, the amount of
would be reported as the short term business capital loss.
In the previous year, Monty had a capital gain of
and
as taxable income.
Therefore, $ 3,600 + $ 3,000 = $ 6,600
So $ 6,600 out of $ 9,000 loss produced the tax benefit. Therefore, only
can be included in the gross income of Monty for this year.