Answer:
$2,014
Explanation:
Alain's net investment income tax is the lesser of 1) his net investment income ($53,000) or 2) his modified adjusted gross income less the threshold of $200,000 .
Therefore
$304,000 - $200,000 = $104,000
3.8%×$104,000= $3,952
($53,000 × 3.8% )= $2,014
The additional tax that alain will pay on his net investment income for the year is $2,014
Answer:
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
A monopoly firm is neither productively nor allocative efficient. The reason behind this is that it does not utilize the resources efficiently and produces below the socially optimal level of output.
Unlike perfect competition, which produces at the point where price equals marginal cost, a monopolist produces at the point where the price is greater than marginal cost.
This inefficiency is visible through the decrease in consumer surplus and deadweight loss. The difference between socially optimal level of output and monopoly output also represents inefficiency. The value of the goods and services that could have been made if monopolist chose to produce at a socially optimal level also shows inefficiency.
Based on the information given regarding the monopoly power, the remedy by the court will be<u> divesting itself of the control or ownership of</u><u> Child Shops</u>.
It should be noted that antitrust laws are put in place in order to protect consumers from business practices that are predatory and also ensure fair competition.
Since antitrust laws recommend the breaking of certain business conducts, there'll be the divesting of the company of the control or ownership of Child Shops.
Learn more about monopoly on:
brainly.com/question/13113415
Answer:
The property would be given to the next available direct relation of his who happens to be his sister. This is because, most property are shared among siblings. Since Smith's sister is one of his sibling, she is entitled to receive the property.
Explanation:
D , because liability means to be responsible for something, especially by law.