Answer:
- 'The law is "narrowly tailored" to achieve the compelling purpose, and uses the "least restrictive means" to achieve the purpose.'
Explanation:
As per 'strict scrutiny analysis,' in order to illustrate that a specific government action is constitutionally accurate, the government requires to demonstrate that the law is closely adapted in order to attain the compelling purpose by employing 'fewer conditional sources' that helps in attaining the desired purpose. Basically, the government needs to prove that the action is necessary to achieve the goal.
The Electoral College<span> is a process, not a place. The founding fathers established it in the Constitution as a compromise between </span>election<span> of the President by a vote in Congress and </span>election<span> of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens.</span>
According to the source, the answer to this question is conscientiousness.
Meaning that as people grow up they become more careful and perceive risks in their actions.
Thank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.
The statement which states that there is strong empirical support indicating that learning two languages <em>interferes </em>with effective cognitive development and this statement is false.
As a result of this, we can see that cognitive development has to do with the way the brain develops with regards to what it can assimilate things and we can see that there is NO evidence which supports that learning two languages would limit this development.
Therefore, the correct answer is false.
Read more about cognitive development here:
brainly.com/question/8627797
