1. soil characteristics
2. how far away the closest untouched ecosystems are
3. the habitat's remaining species
4. the presence of fungi as soil symbionts
Ecological succession refers to the process of changing in an ecological community's species composition through time. The time frame might span several decades or fewer (for instance, following a wildfire).
The community grows through an increase in complexity from a small number of pioneer plants and animals to a stable or self-sustaining climax community. The effects of established species on their own settings serve as the "engine" of succession and the reason why ecosystems evolve. Living has the effect of changing one's surroundings, sometimes subtly and sometimes blatantly.
To know more about Ecological succession refer to brainly.com/question/23762237
#SPJ4
Answer:
Sedimentary rocks such as limestone or shale are hardened sediment with sandy or clay-like layers (strata). They are usually brown to gray in color and may have fossils and water or wind marks. Metamorphic rocks such as marble are tough, with straight or curved layers (foliation) of light and dark minerals.
Explanation:
Answer: Nationalism.
Explanation:
Nationalism is high identification with a nation (usually the nation in which it was born) and a high sense of its worth, and unconditional support for its interests. Diametrically, the belief that other nations have little value.
Nationalism includes an idealized sense of the nation, which includes the belief that the nation has a historical or divine superiority that gives it rights over other nations.
<em>An example of nationalism is Nazi nationalism, they believed that Germany had superior rights that allowed them to rule over other inferior nations.</em>
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
The inference that is best supported by the passage is: A. Prior to the "Click it or Ticket" law, motorist could not be stopped simply for not waring a seatbelt."
Explanation:
In the passage is very clear that in the new law motorist can be now pulled over and ticketed for not wearing seatbelts (later in the passage it implies that's the reason why lawyers and citizens' gorups are protesting), which implies that before the state legislature passed the law this was not a reason to be pulled over even though this is not stated in the passage, the entire text circles around the novelty of pulling over motorist for not wearing seatbelt, therefore the best option is A especially because that is the main idea of the text.
