I believe television is more effective than radio because, television provide a visual image of certain things, and people find visuals more appealing and favorite more than listening to someone speaking. The images tend to capture the mind of the viewer causing them to be more attracted to a certain thing, causing it to have a greater influence on public opinion. For example, If Pepsi chose to create an advertisement in a radio by just simply stating that it's refreshing and saying that you should buy it. But Coca Cola chose to make an ad on TV by showing people enjoying the drink by the pool in a summer day, you are more likely to chose Coke because it appealed to you more than Pepsi. So I think that's why Television is more effective in influencing public opinion than a radio.
Hope this helps you
British intelligence suggested that Bush administration had "cooked the books" to justify the invasion of Iraq, <u>a. U.S. media outlets devoted little attention to the story, television outlets devoted heavy coverage to the story, but print outlets did not virtually all</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Media serves as a watchdog over government in in a democratic society. <u>"Invasion of Iraq"</u> was done during the administration of President George Bush.
British intelligence decided to conduct research on Invasion of Iraq. They did lot of investigation and finally found that the Bush’s government “cooked the books" to justify the invasion of Iraq.
When they submitted this report, the media outlets in the United States showed less attention to the story.
Answer:
To help people understand the society
Explanation:
