The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In France, a committee exists which has the job of eliminating subversive foreign influences in the form of words borrowed from other languages. English is a major offender (as in le bluejeans or le hamburger). This is an example of linguistic nationalism.
Countries such as France uses linguistic nationalism to support their own language, culture, customs, and tradition. They do not like to be affected by linguistic imperialism, where dominant foreigner countries try to use language as a form or influence on other nations. Linguistic nationalism promotes the language of the nation to strengthen the patriotic sense of pride in one's nation.
The answer is B profile page because a profile is where a user can introduce themselves and show what they may or may not like
Either C) Less flooding or B) loss of habitat
It was smarter and more tactical instead of facing them head on and he won when he went through the Alps
Answer:
The conclusion is false, because it is assuming that correlation = causation.
Explanation:
An important principle in statistical analysis is the principle that when correlation exist between two variables or more, it does not mean that one of the variables are causing the other to appear in a certain manner.
Remember that correlation means that you are investigating whether a relationships exists between two variables; in this example, as we can see, it is between the biodiversity in an ecosystem and the population of an insect.
The graph can be said to illustrate the result of the research; that as the biodiversity of the ecosystem goes down, the insect's population goes up. This is a form of negative correlation.
However - we do not know what is the direction of the relationship; the student concludes that as some insects die within the ecosystem, the researched insect's population goes up; assuming that the predator species died off and thus the researched insect's population increases.
Yet, it is also possible for the relationship to go towards the other direction; the researched insect population increases - perhaps by the introduction of a new food source that causes the species' population to increase - and thus, this damages the biodiversity of the ecosystem, making the population go down since it is possible that the researched insect is instead the species which is on top of the food chain at that ecosystem.
To investigate the direction of a relationship, further research need to be done and more sophisticated statistical methods need to be used.
