Answer:
$1,306,986
Explanation:
Calculation to determine What is the levered value of the equity
First step is to calculate the VL
VL = {[$338,000 × (1 - .34)] / .142} + (.34 × $400,000)
VL= $1,706,986
Now let calculate the levered value of the equity (VE)
VE = $1,706,986 - $400,000
VE = $1,306,986
Therefore the levered value of the equity is $1,306,986
Answer: Paul has a taxable dividend of $15,000.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that ABC Corporation has E & P of $240,000 and distributes land with a fair market value of $70,000 (adjusted basis of $25,000) to its sole shareholder, Paul. We are further informed that the land is subject to a liability of $55,000.
The taxable dividend will be the difference between the fair market value of land and the liability on the land. This will be:
= $70,000 - $55,000
= $15,000
Therefore, Paul has a taxable dividend of $15,000.
Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
True.
The Principle of Utility says actions are <u>right </u>when they promote happiness or pleasure, and wrong when they cause unhappiness or pain. So in order to figure out if something is right or wrong you will first have to know if it promotes happiness.
Answer:
d. not selected option d copyright
