All categories

3 years ago

After the OhoyAlloyDeploySepoy Rebellion, the British government took over political control of India.

1 answer:

3 0

After the "Sepoy Rebellion, the British government took over political control of India, since the British used this as an excuse to consolidate power for the sake of increased profits.

You might be interested in

Who was a popular soverighty

bonufazy [111]

I'm thinking your question means to ask, "What is popular sovereignty?"

"Popular sovereignty" means the people are in charge of establishing a government over themselves.

The founding fathers of the United States adopted the idea of popular sovereignty from Enlightenment philosophers like John Locke (of England) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (of France).

The Declaration of Independence (1776), written primarily by Thomas Jefferson, asserted the concept of popular sovereignty. The Declaration insisted that people institute governments in order to secure their rights, and that governments get their authority from the consent of the governed. "Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends," the Declaration of Independence said, "it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

8 0

3 years ago

To know

katrin2010 [14]

1. summons = a document that orders a person to appear before the court

2. capital crime = a serious crime that is punishable by death

3. damages = an action that causes damages

4. tort = a monetary award that a defendant gives to a plaintiff in a civil case

5. indictment = a formal written accusation of a crime, which leads to a trial

3 0

2 years ago

menciona cuales fueron las causas que llevaron a los estados europeos a la primera guerra mundial ayuda porfa

Scilla [17]

Explanation:

te doy la respuesta y tú me das tu nombre

Radicalización del nacionalismo

Hacia finales del siglo XIX ya se había consolidado la ideología del nacionalismo en el imaginario europeo. El nacionalismo planteaba la idea de que un pueblo estaría unido sobre la base de una cultura, lengua, economía y geografía compartida, y que de allí brotaría un destino para el cual habría nacido.

Junto a ello, el nacionalismo abrazaba y se abraza a la idea de que la forma legítima de administrar la nación es un auto-gobierno nacional.

En estas circunstancias, las naciones ya conformadas lucharían por crear un repertorio de símbolos y elementos para definir su identidad y competir contra otros en la consecución de su destino. En aquellas regiones donde persistían modelos imperiales, como el Imperio otomano y el Imperio austrohúngaro, comenzaba un proceso de erosión.

Vea también Nacionalismo.

Desarrollo exponencial de la industria armamentística

La industria armamentística alcanzó también un elevadísimo nivel de desarrollo, que implicó el diseño de nuevo y mejor armamento: armas biológicas, lanzallamas, ametralladoras, granadas, tanques de guerra, acorazados, submarinos, aviones, etc.

Los países habían invertido grandes cantidades de dinero en la fabricación de estas armas y había quienes estaban deseosos de usarlos.

Expansión del imperialismo europeo

En el siglo XX tuvo lugar un exceso en la producción de bienes de consumo industrializados, lo que exigía nuevos mercados, así como la adquisición de más y nuevas materias primas.

Azuzados por el nacionalismo, y habiendo perdido el control sobre América en el siglo XIX, los Estados europeos comenzaron la competición por dominar el territorio africano como cantera de recursos, así como la competición por el control de los mercados no europeos.

El imperialismo representó un grave problema interno para Europa debido, entre otros factores, a la desigualdad en el reparto de las colonias africanas.

Mientras Gran Bretaña y Francia concentraban más y mejor territorio, Alemania tenía poco y era menos ventajoso, y el Imperio austrohúngaro reclamaba alguna participación en el reparto.

8 0

3 years ago

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST ANSWER

skelet666 [1.2K]

Answer:1. They both werent in it much until a country they saw as no harm to them attacked them and they both retaliated.

2. It did give more jobs but it also took homes as it would've been a decent sized plant

3. During ww2 the nazis gave the germans a scapegoat to fall back on which was the jews and the communists and hitler also promised them a bigger and better germany so they were all for it when he said the germanic peoples wouldnt recognize germany when he was done with it

4. Due to japan having this social structure it gave tgem the idea that you must fight to the end and that it was a great honor to die in battle so they didnt give up and this affected the war effort as in they would just keep going on and on and on and just kept getting killed

5. They just didnt give up so we had to cripple them take them out at a weakpoint and destroy their economy

6. They had the same enemies and allies so they just fell in line with eachother and fought together

4 0

3 years ago

Increased competition for power among European states and led to imperialism

ololo11 [35]

In general, yes it is true that increased competition for power among European states and led to imperialism, but first it led to nationalism, which then led to imperialism, since nationalism inspired far more pride.

6 0

3 years ago