All categories

3 years ago

. Says law says? Do you agree or disagree with Jean? (Jean Baptiste Say) EXPLAIN. (hint...loanable funds market

1 answer:

5 0

To answer the question above as to Jean's explanation on Say's Law or The Law of Market.. I agree that "if there is a surplus of goods, there must be unmet of demand for others". Jean's explanation is more of a Capitalist style of management.

You might be interested in

Quantas Industries sold $300,000 of consumer electronics during January under a one-year warranty. The cost to repair defects un

finlep [7]

Answer:

January 31.

Warranty Expense $18,000 (debit)

Warranty Provision $18,000 (credit)

June 20.

Warranty Provision $183 (debit)

Cash $183 (credit)

Explanation:

There is no option on the customer to take the warranty or not. There this type of Warranty is known as an Assurance Type Warranty.

Assurance type warranties are accounted in terms of the Provision Standards as follows ;

Entry when the warranty is granted

Warranty Expense $18,000 (debit)

Warranty Provision $18,000 (credit)

Being recognition of warranty cost and provision.

Warranty Expense $300,000 × 6% = $18,000

When the Warranty Claim is subsequently received.

Warranty Provision $183 (debit)

Cash $183 (credit)

Being utilization of Provision when the warranty claim is received.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is not one of the factors to consider in determining whether a business entity meets the definition of a

alexgriva [62]

2. It engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses.

3 0

3 years ago

actionow and becca enter into an oral contract in which becca agrees to work on a project for actionow’s living opportunities ce

JulsSmile [24]

Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.

<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>

This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.

The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.

Options include:

a. ActioNOW.
b. Becca.
c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
d. none of the choices

Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791

#SPJ1

8 0

1 year ago

The financial statements of the larson company report net sales of $1,000,000 and accounts receivable of $80,000 and $60,000 at

stepan [7]

To calculate the average collection period: the average accounts receivable balance divided by average credit sales per day. With $1,000,000 per year, that is $2739.73 per day. The average accounts receivable is ($80,000 + $60,000) / 2 = $70,000 $70,000 / $2,739.73 = 25.6 days

4 0

3 years ago

Consider the following duopoly in which the two firms sell a homogeneous product. The inverse demand is given by p = 10 − 1 2 Q.

Feliz [49]

Answer:

Price will be 6.6

Explanation:

You can find the attached file.

Download docx

3 0

3 years ago