Answer:
<em>James–Lange theory
</em>
Explanation:
The emotion theory of James Lange specifies <em>that emotion is equal to the range of physiological excitement caused by natural occurrences.</em>
Scientists William James and Carl Lange suggested that he / she should first experience body responses like increased respiration, increased heart rate, or sweaty hands in order for someone to feel emotion.
After this physiological reaction is identified, the person can say that the emotion is felt by him / her.
Ransom makes a free choice to travel to Oyarsa when he submits in obedience; he is not giving up his free will in doing so.
<h3>What is meant by OBEDIENCE?</h3>
It simply means hearing God's word and acting upon it. It implies that we should obey God's commands and submit to his will. It happens when we fully submit to His authority and base all of our decisions and deeds on his word.
<h3>What does obedience have to offer?</h3>
Children learn to take into account others' needs as they learn obedience. They develop a little less self-centeredness. They develop the ability to fit into other people's agendas. They pick up how to defer to authority. To be obedient, one must learn to carry out requests.
To know more about obedience visit :
brainly.com/question/29031144
#SPJ4
Urban - having to do with city living
Answer:
A change in the meaning of an unambiguous provision in the contract
Explanation:
The main aim of the pleading the parol evidence rule is to ensure that a party is prevented from any introduction of evidence of oral agreements made before the contract was agreed or in the process of reducing the agreement to its final form for the purpose of altering the existing terms in the current contract. Hence Weaver pleading the parol evidence rule ensures that Ward does not introduce parol evidence as long as it relates to a change in any of the provisions in the contract.
Answer:
d. Forcing
Explanation:
Forcing technique: The term "forcing technique" is described as one of the different techniques of conflict resolution in which an individual tends to use some power or formal authority that he or she possesses in order to satisfy his or her concern in the absence of any regard associated with the party or person with whom he or she in conflict with.
In the question above, the given statement represents the forcing technique of conflict resolution.
