Answer:
Parts of Email:
Part 2 of the email is part of Introduction and Details as explained below.
Explanation:
Emails can be divided into six major components:
1. Subject Line: Proposed Agenda for November 6 Meeting
2. Greeting: Dear Ms. Stanford
3. Intro/Purpose: Please review the following agenda for our next shareholder meeting and recommend any changes.
4. Details: Agenda for our next shareholder meeting
• Rising stock prices
• Discussion of new investors
• Portfolios and new funding
• Introduction of new vice-president
5. Ask/Action: Please send any changes to the agenda to me by 3:00 p.m., November 3.
6.Closing/Sign-off: Many thanks, Thomas Thomas Gregory Financial Analyst Office: 854.454.4356 Fax: 435.458.9738 Cell: 834.435.8490
Answer:
Intrinsic value is $45
Explanation:
The starting point to determining Rivoli Company intrinsic value is to compute the earning after tax as shown below:
Earnings after tax=earning before tax*(1-tax rate)
earnings before tax is $600,000
tax rate
earnings after tax=$600,000*(1-0.25)
=$600,000*0.75
=$450,000
Then we need to compute earnings per share;
Earnings per shares=earnings after tax/weighted average number of shares
=$450,000/100,000
=$4.5
Intrinsic value=earnings per share/cost of equity
cost of equity is 10%
intrinsic value=$4.5/10%
=$45
Answer:
C. What the program will ultimately cost the federal government
Explanation:
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 was an attempt to make improvements or amendments to the Social Security Act. It radically changed the playing field for private plans participating in the Medicare program by substantially raising monthly payment rates in an effort to stabilize the market and reverse the decline in benefit generosity. It also provided for voluntary prescription drugs under the medicare program. However, the utilization and cost of the program skyrocketed as soon as the funding source was established. It has remained unknown what the program will ultimately cost the federal government, no wonder the current administration under Trump wants to turn it upside down.
Answer:
(A) Because the regulation effectively reduced the price of cool air, consumers with sufficiently elastic demand might have bought substantially more of it.
Explanation:
If the demand for energy services remains constant, improving energy efficiency will reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions. However, many efficiency improvements do not reduce energy consumption by the amount provided by simple engineering models. This is because they make energy services cheaper and therefore increases the consumption of those services.
For example, since low-fuel vehicles make travel cheaper, consumers can choose to drive further, thus offsetting some of the possible energy savings. Similarly, an extensive historical analysis of improvements in technological efficiency has conclusively demonstrated that improvements in energy efficiency were almost always overcome by economic growth, which resulted in a net increase in resource use and associated contamination.
