Simply put, they were fighting an unpopular war that was against an enemy we basically couldn't see. We were fighting an enemy who would hide among the Vietnamese civilians. Many of the soldiers we were fighting were untrained farmers, however the fact they would not come out as soldier made it harder to root them out. They also knew the land better than us so they had the terrain to their advantage. The Vietnamese were just guerilla fighters, who we had issues with fighting because we could never tell who was an enemy. Often times, civilians would die due to the choices of these fighters, causing the Vietnam war to be very unpopular back at home. So our soldiers who had no morale to boost them back at home, were fighting an invisible enemy and then coming back home and being booed fr what thy did.
Answer: They wanted to sell goods to France without being taxed by Britain D. They were upset they had no right to petition the king or the British government.
Explanation:
The best answers for this question would be:
<span>intervention in strikes affecting public welfare
and
the use of arbitration to settle labor disputes
Both answers describe how the government wants to be involved in order to conduct a peaceful conclusion. The methods are to have order with two types of people disagreeing, this is also to see what their point is. In conclusion, this is to listen to the people better and to understand opinion.</span>
However, if a state law affords a person more rights than federal law, the state law is legally presumed to prevail, albeit only within that state. At the same time, if a state imposes more responsibility on its residents than the federal law, the state law<span> prevails.</span>
