Desoto on the shore of the mississippi
Protect people's rights from infridgement by the government, social organizations and more. It also helped people not to be discriminated on when voting. Hope this helps!
Answer:
Efficacy versus effectiveness
Explanation:
Efficacy versus effectiveness are both the same term but are different to some extent. Both terms are used to describe and get the result of the research. But we can describe effectiveness and efficacy in the medical condition in a different context. Effectiveness in the medical condition is getting the result in the natural wold environment without any controlled condition. Whereas the efficacy is reverse from effectiveness as the efficacy is the result under the controlled condition. The efficacy described how the medicine is used in controlled or ideal conditions whereas the effectiveness described how the medicine works in an average clinical setting or the natural world environment.
Introduction. Six major German tribes, the Visigoths<span>, the </span>Ostrogoths<span>, the </span>Vandals<span>, the </span>Burgundians<span>, the </span>Lombards<span>, and the Franks participated in the fragmentation and the collapse of the Western Roman Empire. The </span>Vandals<span> were actually two tribes, the Asding and the Siling </span>Vandals<span>.</span>
Your question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
As a hungry dog runs ever closer toward a bowl of food, the less likely it is to stop running until it reaches the food. This best illustrates that the dog's running behavior is most strongly affected by ________ reinforcers.
a) secondary
b) immediate
c) partial
d) negative
Answer:
This best illustrates that the dog's running behavior is most strongly affected by <u>b) immediate</u> reinforcers.
Explanation:
We can reach the conclusion above by elimination. A secondary reinforcement is one associated with a primary one. Suppose you're teaching the dog to sit. When the dog sits, you give it a treat (primary reinforcer) and then say, "Good job!" (secondary reinforcer). That is not the case here.
A partial reinforcer is one given every now and then, that is, not every time the desired behavior happens. That is also not the case.
A negative reinforcer is the removal of something that was already present. Imagine you have made your son do the dishes after he misbehaved. When he behaves properly, you tell him he doesn't have to do the dishes anymore. You didn't give him a reward; you simply removed the punishment. That is negative reinforcement.
<u>Therefore, we are left with immediate reinforcers. The dog has already learned that the bowl contains food, that food will be given to him immediately if he reaches the bowl. That is why he doesn't stop nor doesn't get distracted. He is hungry and wants to end his hunger immediately.</u>
