Answer:
because america is really just a melting pot of all different types of people and religion americans also pride them selves on the religious freedom in america
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Answer: Although the U.S. Constitution grants _*VETO* _ to the office of the presidency, a president who fails to uphold the public trust may be removed from office.
If the president does fail to achieve the trust of the people or the government then he can be impeached by the parliament after completing the procedure of voting between the 2 houses
• The Congress
• The Senate
<span>This refers to the acute treatment phase of treating depression. The acute phase of treatment is seeks to diagnose the disorder, educate the patient, ensure the patient's safety, and begin treatment. Once the these goals have been met successfully, the patient is considered to be in remission.</span>
Answer:
D- To effectively manage spending
