I think that the nightmare scene near at the end of the drama speaks to the idea that war is something that demands moral and active opposition should one feel it. Thoreau feels that the war is unjust. Yet, his nightmare is the result of inaction. The nightmare scene is one in which Thoreau's objection to war is evident. but the lack of action has enabled the machine of war to take over. It renders Thoreau's own voice as ineffective. This is why the ending of the drama has him leaving Walden in the hope of taking a more active and visible role against the nature of war. It is here where the drama speaks about the idea of how one must actively resist war, if they feel compelled to do so. If individuals authentically believe that war is wrong, they simply cannot be passive if they wish to change things. Thoreau's ending is one in which he speaks to the idea of bridging theory and reality. The theoretical principles of opposition to war must be matched to a reality in which individuals actively resist war. This becomes vitally important in both Thoreau's characterization in the drama and the statement being made about the condition of war.
<span>E - Is the text structured to explain a cause and effect relationship.
None of the other options are quite applicable. The cause of WW1 was the assisination of the Austro-Hungarian heir</span>
To provide your résumé to a potential employer
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is option B. <span>The daily life of the author of "The Wife's Lament" can best be described as lonely. I guess you can already sense the loneliness from the title itself having the word lament. Hope this helps.</span>
