Answer: $54,000 per production run
Explanation:
As we are dealing with the decision of whether or not to process the good further, the irrelevant cost would be the cost of producing product B from input R.
This is because this cost has already been incurred to produce product B and so is a sunk cost. Sunk costs are irrelevant to the decision to process further.
30,000 units of B were made from 90,000 units R so the cost of B is:
= 30,000 / 50,000 * 90,000
= $54,000
<em />
<em>The options here are probably for a variant of this question.</em>
B/ <span>Cost of repainting the kitchen before moving in</span>
Answer:
D. More Units may be sold - but total revenue will be less than it would be at the higher price
Explanation:
Marginal Revenue (MR) represents the additional revenue that can be obtained if sales of a product are increased by one unit.
MR= is change in Total Revenue/Change in Total Output Quantity
In this situation as envisaged by the Marketing Manager, a price cut will lead to an increase in revenue based on more (marginal) units of the product sold at a lower price. The challenge, however, is that this increase in income will not be enough to offset the decrease in revenue that will result as a result of the price cut.
In other words, the organisation is better off selling fewer products or units at its current price than sell more (marginal units) at a reduced price.
A seller's willingness to accept is the same as his marginal cost of production.
Marginal cost is the increase or decrease in cost of production if the output is increased. The marginal cost of production is the change in the total cost of the product from producing one addition item.
Answer:
dogs
Explanation:
BCG is a measurement of a company's brand control of a market. In BCG analysis, a firm's market share and the growth rate of the industry are used to check how well a brand could perform, whilst also proffering or giving advice on continuous investment means.
According to BCG matrix, there are four categories brand of firms. They are; dogs, question marks, cash cows and stars.
For dogs, the share of the market held by them is quite low when compared to what competitors hold, hence not worth investing in. They generate low returns which is why it is advisable not to invest in them. However, it is quite essential to conduct thorough investigation in terms of brands investment because for dogs, they may be profitable in the long run or act as a shield to protect others against competitors or completes the make up for other brands.
