Answer: Threat
Explanation:
The threat is one of the important factor in the SWOT analysis that is basically used for analyzing the main causes of the damages in an organization, products and the venture. The threats can be defined as external or in a negative way.
The SWOT is stand for the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and the threats and these are the techniques for evaluating the four main aspects of the business.
According to the given question, the implementation of the new government regulations are reducing the availability of the raw materials and this is known as the external organization threat in the given SWOT analysis.
Therefore, Threat is the correct answer.
Answer:
B. Subscribers cancelling their subscriptions
Explanation:
Central Times’s business environment had suffered tremendousy in recent times with transition from newspaper publication to online journalism. As a result of this, Time's publishing company has faced many problems some of which are highlighted below: many of the newspaper subscribers have cancelled their subscription, they were losing revenue, they had to relief a third of their reporting staff primarily. However, amidst all these, <u>the primary cause of disruption to Central Times’s business environment is option B</u> (Subscribers cancelling their subscriptions). It was this problem that led to the other problems (loss of revenue, firing a third of their reporting staffs)
Answer:
Return on investment=12.81%
Explanation:
<em>Return on investment for a stock comprises of the capitals and dividend earned on the stock.</em>
<em>The capital gain is the difference between he cost of the shares when it was bought and the value when it is sold.</em>
Capital gain = (24.50 -22)× 500= 1250
Dividend earned for a year = 0.32× 500 =160
Total return = 1250 + 160 =1,410
Total return = $1,410
Cost of the shares= 11,000
Return on investment = total return/cost of shares× 100
=1,410
/11,000 × 100= 12.81
Return on investment=12.81%
Answer:
Almost every other business in this universe now relies upon group thinking rather than individual approach to anything.
It has several advantages, some of them are pointed out below:
o) Equality bias, when there are group discussion, this means that everyone has a part of say in the final decision and that leads to equality bias, which is beneficial.
o) More alternatives are generated, it is a fact that when an individual takes a decision, he/she is neglecting a lot of other options to explore which could be a lot beneficial for the business.
o) More acceptance of the final decision, Since the final decision taken is with the approval and consent of everyone, there is a possibility that the final decision will be more acceptable.
o) Lastly, It creates Synergy, synergy is the idea that a decision as a whole is better than in parts.
Hope this helps you. Good Luck.
Monopolistically competitive firms (A) cannot influence the market price by virtue of their size alone while monopolies and oligopolies can.
<h3>
What is a monopoly?</h3>
- A monopoly occurs when there is a single seller in the market.
- The monopoly case is considered the polar opposite of perfect competition in conventional economic theory.
- The demand curve facing the monopolist is, by definition, the industry demand curve, which is downward sloping.
<h3>What is
oligopoly?</h3>
- Oligopolistic markets are characterized by a small number of suppliers.
- They can be found in all nations and in a wide range of industries.
- Some oligopoly markets are very competitive, whereas others are substantially less so, or appear to be.
Monopolistically competitive enterprises, unlike monopolies and oligopolies, cannot influence market prices only through their size.
Therefore, monopolistically competitive firms (A) cannot influence the market price by virtue of their size alone while monopolies and oligopolies can.
Know more about monopoly here:
brainly.com/question/13113415
#SPJ4
Correct question:
The feature that differentiates monopolistic competition from monopolies and oligopolies is that monopolistically competitive firms.
(A) cannot influence the market price by virtue of their size alone.
(B) are price takers.
(C) do not have a price as a decision variable.
(D) benefit from barriers to entry.