Answer:
The missing options are:
A. Potential confounding variables are not always controlled din laboratory studies
.
B. Retention tests employed in laboratory studies are usually once merged with factual information rather than emotions
.
C. The intensity of emotional responses is more accurately measured after the event in laboratory studies
.
D. Memories and emotional experiences as in real life are very different from those generated in laboratory studies.
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
Generalizability measures how useful is what scientists have been studying in a laboratory in comparison with the real-life since the first option is a prototype of reality that can miss valuable variables that can have an impact on the real life. With generalizability, we can see if the results of the investigation and the process that scientists used are useful in real life and can apply to other things or communities. The efficiency of generalizability depends on how well the representation of reality was in the laboratory.
This continent (apart from Europe) was Africa. It is also referred to as "scramble for Africa" in which the European countries (England, France, Portugal, Italy, Germany) were fighting each other over land in Africa.
Answer: B. It meant there was enough time for evolution to have occurred slowly
Explanation: Contrary to the theory of creationism, according to which everything is created in the beginning as it is created and the characteristics of animals, plants and humans are the same from the beginning, Darwin's theory of evolution speaks of the gradual development of the qualities necessary for survival. Thus, according to the theory of creationism, the Earth is not very old, at least not as much as was necessary to justify Darwin's evolution. The changes described by Darwin take millions of years, so the theory that the Earth is very old is quite in favour.
This is a hilarious question. I guess her reign affected Thurmose III as when he took the throne, he destroyed Hatshepsut's records of "great deeds."
I believe the answer is: <span>generativity vs. stagnation
Generativity in this context refers to the act leaving your mark in society by giving it some sort of contribution for the collective goods. Stagnation on the other hand, tend to be chosen by people who already content with what they have (or too afraid to fail for some)
</span>