Due to changes in production, Hanson steel gave each employee 75 percent of the cost savings. Hanson steel uses a <u>gainsharing </u>compensation plan.
A compensation plan refers to the practices, methods, and intentional approach that's used by an organization in maintaining financial interests and developing, retaining, attracting, and rewarding employees in an industry.
It should be noted that the gainsharing compensation plan refers to a compensation plan that is used to increase profitability as employees share in the company's gain. Since the workers share 75% of the cost savings, this is a gain-sharing compensation plan.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25356534
i just asked my brother , and he goes to business school at bentley university in massachusetts, he said he was in a similar situation he said that reporting it to your supervisors is the best idea.
your welcome!!
Answer:
The correct option is b. The income from continuing operations is $1141000.
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that the tax rate is 30% while the income before income taxes was $1,630,000 which means that the The income from continuing operations is $1141000 calculated as:
Income from continuing operations=[$1,630,000-(30%*$1,630,000)]
Income from continuing operations=$1,630,000-$489,000
Income from continuing operations=$1,141,000
A problem in developing effective compensation for teams is that rewarding individuals erodes cohesiveness. Thus the first option is correct.
<h3>What is Cohesiveness?</h3>
Cohesiveness refers to the act or the property of togetherness. in the group , cohesiveness can be seen when the group performs the activity. It is important to have cohesiveness in every group for the accomplishment of the task.
When a individual in a group is provided a compensation it leads to dispute and chaos which erodes the cohesiveness of the group. Thus the first option is correct.
Learn more about Cohesiveness here:
brainly.com/question/13774781
#SPJ1
Answer:
This situation is an example of cross Price elasticity of Demand
Explanation:
If change in Price in Rental Company A doesn't necessitate change in prices in Rental companies B.C.D.E & F
Then the products A has on offer are not close substitutes to the rival companies
However where Rental company G lowers his price and it immediately triggers a Price reduction in Companies B to F, then obviously they offer similar products that are close substitutes and serve similar segment or channel of the Market Size. Thus failure to lower their Price will automatically see Customers rent cars more from Company G.
This situation is an example of cross Price elasticity of Demand
