1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mademuasel [1]
3 years ago
7

I need help asap plzzz​

History
1 answer:
astra-53 [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

WhiteWater

Explanation:

K12 right?

You might be interested in
What was a major outcome of the arms race during the Cold War?
dalvyx [7]

The lack of democracy, economic backwardness and crisis in the Soviet republics eventually accelerated the crisis of socialism in the late 1980s. In 1989 the Berlin Wall falls and the two Germanys are reunited.

In the early 1990s, then-president of the Soviet Union Gorbachev began to accelerate the end of socialism in that country and its allies. With economic reforms, agreements with the US, and political changes, the system has been weakening. It was the end of a period of political, ideological and military clashes. Victorious capitalism was gradually being implanted in the socialist countries.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where were doorknobs created?
babunello [35]

1878 was the year doorknobs were created.


8 0
3 years ago
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
3 years ago
What did passage of the immigration act of 1965 accomplish?
viktelen [127]

Answer: The law allowed no more immigration from European nations.

Explanation: The Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965 abolished a prior quota system dependent on national origin and built up another movement strategy dependent on rejoining migrant families and pulling in skilled labor to the United States.

Throughout the following four decades, the policies put into impact in 1965 would enormously change the demographic makeup of the American populace, as settlers entering the United States under the new enactment came progressively from nations like Asia, Africa and Latin America, rather than Europe.

4 0
2 years ago
How did felix frankfurter stand on brown v. board of education?
andrew-mc [135]
The correct answer is Felix Frankfurter<span> wanted to outlaw segregation, so he asked that the case be reargued so that he had time to convince more justices and build consensus

He believed that there was a need to solve it with "all deliberate speed" which means that desegregation had to be rapidly implemented and not dragged on. This plan of his backfired and the thing did drag on with many schools in the South waiting for as much as 15 years after the court decision before finally desegregating. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the late 1800s, India became a(n) ____ of Great Britain. A. Circumnavigation B. isthmus C. Monopoly D. Colony E. missionary F
    13·2 answers
  • How do the diplomatic policies during the cold war connect to other eras and diplomatic approaches in history?
    8·1 answer
  • Match these men with the appropriate description.
    6·2 answers
  • Who invaded roman territory in the third century
    11·2 answers
  • What were the effects on democracy when king john tried to raise taxes on the nobles. ?
    6·1 answer
  • When Northern soldiers proclaimed they were fighting to protect and defend the Constitution, in reality, what was it they wanted
    6·1 answer
  • What role did washington play in the drafting of the u.s. constitution?
    6·1 answer
  • Cómo está formado el pueblo dominicano
    11·1 answer
  • SOMEONE HELP ME PLEASE !!!! ILL GIVE BRAINLY
    7·1 answer
  • I dont need points so enjoy!<br><br> 24 points
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!