Answer:
Osiris is the right answer.
Explanation:
In Ancient Egyptian mythology, Osiris was the god of the living and the dead. He has also been regarded as the Judge of the Dead. He is considered to be the eldest of all children of god Geb and Goddess Nut. He was given an epithet "Khenti-Amentiu" in reference to his royality to the land of the dead. Though it is believed that his worship began a long time before the first evidence for his worship is found in the rule of the Fifth Dynasty of Egypt.
Answer:
Both.
Explanation:
Both dog and cat has the same potential energy because of the same mass of both animals. Potential energy depends on the height and mass of the body. if the mass of the body increases, its potential energy automatically increases and vice versa. If both dog and cat have the same mass, they have similar potential energy so we can conclude from the discussion that both have the same potential energy in their body.
Answer:
Actors are very good at being able to express emotions for a variety of situations. It can safely be assumed that these actors would score high on measures of emotional intelligence.
Explanation:
<u>Emotional intelligence consists of perceiving, managing, understanding and using emotions. Usually, people who are good at expressing emotions in varied situations score high on emotional intelligence, which is the case with actors. Emotional intelligence also helps people deal with everyday situations and difficulties, since they can better manage their reactions and decisions. </u>For instance, you feel like playing video games with your siblings, but instead you choose to study for an important test. That is a sign of emotional intelligence.
The need for affiliation corresponds to the belongingness level of needs in abrahm maslow's hierarchy of needs. Belongingness is the third level of needs in abrahm maslow's hierarchy of needs. The third level represents the social need for affiliation, also known as love and belonging.
Answer:
D. Nothing
Explanation:
Angela is not guilty here. Te question tells us that she had no knowledge of her friends intentions. Her friend had the intention of robbing a store and even though angela drove the car, she did not know that a gun was concealed somewhere. If she had knowledge of these before hand, she would have been guilty of aiding and abetting a crime. But since she didn't, she is not guilty.
