With the first one,you're going to want to use Ethos,or the appeal to emotions,for this to work. I would say this: There is an extent to which someone can be punished. If somebody committed murder,the death penalty,or more politely called "Capital Punishment",would honestly have no effect on them. It does not truly give them a chance to dwell on their actions and how they messed up someone's life. Not only that,but you also become a murderer if an innocent man is found guilty of a murder he didn't commit,which makes you no better than a murderer. Worse in fact because at least the person who actually did kill someone did it them selves and not with an executioner. I don't support Capital punishment because that puts someone else's blood on my hands.
As for the second one...I'd say this: By nature,humans are social creatures. We desire human contact and interaction. In fact,we NEED it in order to function normally. Capital Punishment only supports the tradition of "An Eye For An Eye And A Tooth For A Tooth." If you really want to punish someone,don't kill them physically,but instead mentally and socially. If you take away someone's ability to interact with people,it causes them to think back on their mistakes and it leaves them with no other choice but to confront their bad choices. Capital Punishment gets it over with quickly with no time to repent or ask for forgiveness,but life in prison with no chance of parole unless proven mentally capable by a team of psychologists,is by far the worst punishment you could ever give someone.
Answer:
b) focusing on quantity over quality
Explanation:
Participation has to do with including other people in a task to achieve a common goal.
Being a team player is an effective participation strategy because it means you include other people by asking for their views, input, ideas, and effort.
Engaging in meaningful conversations is another effective participation strategy because one is sharing ideas and rubbing minds with others in order to get a job done.
The option that is NOT an effective participation strategy is choosing quantity over quality because this shows that one does not value quality but instead chooses to do more, even if they are of lesser quality and this suggest that a team involvement is not really valued.
Answer:
There are 4 hemispheres, eastern, western, southern, and northern. The Equator, or line of 0 degrees latitude, divides the Earth into the Northern and Southern hemispheres. It is also known as a half-sphere. And geographers, or people who study Earth, have divided the planet into two sets of two hemispheres. These are the Northern and Southern hemispheres and the Eastern and Western hemispheres.
Explanation:
Answer:
.(A) Small group is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Communicating with 3 to 12 other people united over time for a common purpose is the definition of Small group communication.
Small group communication is the interaction where three or more people have the same goal, and they are connected through mutual influence and with the common objective.
small group communication(characteristics)
- The small groups have about three or more members in the group, who share a similar purpose.
- This group is formed for a particular goal.
advantage of small group communication
- In small group communication information is easily distributed in a small group.
- Small group communication help to solve a specific problem.
Working together between countries
