Answer:
It is too far to read, please upload and I will answer :)
Explanation:
Aurangzeb did not respect his father and also throwed him to prison. Akbar was the third successor of the Bhabur the founder of the Mughal dynasty. Aurangzeb was the great grand son of Akbar and son of Shah jahan. Akabar did respected his parents and his Dynast and promoted the growth of his Dydnasty. He was one of the main reason why Mughal empire lost it’s power. Thus aurangzeb is totaly different from akbar. Mughal rulers', Akbar and Aurangzeb, policies were motivated by religious fluidity by Akbar who created a diverse, accepting, and highly successful empire while Aurangzeb's religious rigidity was the downfall of the Mughals. Akbar was very against having one religion in charge, eliminated the Jizya, made Persian the official language, established the Ibadat Khana and the Divine Faith in Fatehpur, combined religions. Aurangzeb returned to religious orthodoxy and reestablished the Jizya, resulted in revolts of sikhs and hindus and ultimately led to the downfall of the empire.
The 2003 invasion of Iraq<span> lasted from 20 March to 1 May </span>2003<span> and signaled the start of the </span>Iraq War, which was dubbed OperationIraqi<span> Freedom by the </span><span>United States</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is D. Inspecting restaurant kitchens to make sure they are clean is an example of public policy.
Explanation:
Public policy is a concept of political science which designates the interventions of an authority invested with public power and governmental legitimacy in a specific area of society or territory.
Public policies can also be described as a set of coordinated actions, carried out by a public authority, with a view to obtaining a modification or an evolution of a given situation. The fields concerned can be of any kind: infrastructure, health, family, housing, employment, vocational training, research, public service, crisis, deficit, etcetera.
Therefore, a series of inspections of the restaurant kitchens in a given place, with the aim of contributing to the improvement of the sanitary conditions of society, is a clear example of a public policy.
The decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford i believe.
