For this assignment, it is basically comparing the positive and negative effect of using technology to study individually. Just pick a side and stick to that topic. Here is two example thesis statement for both sides.
Pro: many students have difficulty learning at the same pace as their peers, technology gives them the opportunity to be able to study at their own pace from their home and it also motivates students to broaden their knowledge on worldly matters in which they do not receive in a typical school setting.
Cons: When studying for a test or simply doing homework, technology is not the best choice. Students need the physical interaction between them and the teachers or other peers as it will help them to be able to produce critical thinking on any matter, communicate, collaborate with others, and be creative;the 4 C's that are not always produced successfully when using technology as a source of studying.
These are just examples. You can use any type of examples but, you don't want to make it too broad. Also, when making key points for your thesis or when making a thesis, always be direct. Never use 'I think', 'I believe', etc. as it makes it seem as if you are not sure of your points. If you need anymore help, feel free to ask. I did a similar essay to this when I was in high school except, it asked what are the pros and cons of using technology as a source of learning.
Answer:
for me it was gasped and beautiful im sorry if its wrong
Explanation:
have a nice day
<u>Answer:</u>
Based on the excerpt, the most reasonable plot prediction is that (A) Farquhar may unknowingly walk into a trap.
<u>Explanation:</u>
“An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” by “Ambrose Bierce” is a story set during American Civil War. The soldier had disguised himself and he was a scout. Gradually in the story we come to know that 'Farquhar' had been set up through a tricky play. So, the correct option is option A.
Farquhar is a supporter of confederate. Thinking that the soldier that came is confederate he informed about the movements of the Union soldiers, thinking Confederate could win the war with this information. But the 'Confederate soldier' was a Union soldier in disguise.
