According to the structural-functional approach, the one that considered as a direct benefit of disengagement from work is: It allows the next generation to transition into jobs.
Especially when a worker became too old for his job, it would be really beneficial if they start to train a younger potential replacement for him when his retirement time come.
Answer:
self-administered survey
Explanation:
Jackie is doing a study on the number of hours spent watching TV and how this affects family cohesion. She decides to mail a questionnaire to randomly selected households in her state. This is an example of <u>self-administered survey</u>. A self-administered survey is a survey that is done or designed in such a way that the researcher will not interfere with the respondents. In this method the respondents complete the survey on their own with no agent to guide or interfere in the process. While this method is relatively cheap, the respondents feel more at ease, there is a higher requirement of respondents because due to the absence of monitoring or guidance there is usually increased error in questionnaires.
Answer:
She might prefer to take a top-down approach to hiring decisions.
Explanation:
In <em>management and organization</em>, he top-down approach refers to a top individual, high ranked, carrying out decisions about how things should go or should be.
This is an example of the top-down approach because the hiring decision is being made by the HR director, who feels that if the applicants score higher on a test then they will do better.
Answer:
If isolationism has become outdated, what kind of foreign policy does the United States follow? In the years after World War II, the United States was guided generally by containment — the policy of keeping communism from spreading beyond the countries already under its influence. The policy applied to a world divided by the Cold War, a struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union.
With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, containment no longer made sense, so in the past ten years, the United States has been redefining its foreign policy. What are its responsibilities, if any, to the rest of the world, now that it has no incentive of luring them to the American "side" in the Cold War? Do the United States still need allies? What action should be taken, if any, when a "hot spot" erupts, causing misery to the people who live in the nations involved? The answers are not easy.
mark me brainliest plz :)
James Watson and Francis Crick
I think this is the answer .
