John Rawls tossed this Latin expression around "a blank state" to enable us to comprehend ourselves in a circumstance in which there were no tenets. We needed to build up the standards for how we would communicate with each other exclusively and in business. Rawls trusted that judicious souls would concur on some fundamental and reasonable tenets that would help them additionally secure others.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Through the process of elimination, you can see that b is the answer because the information does show primaries are important, but they dont really play a role in every part of becoming president.
The answers not c because the popular vote does count since they must receive an electoral vote. And d is not the answer because money is necessary for political parties [to fund their purpose]
<span>o ask a still more obvious question, what is the purpose of this technological progress? What higher aim do we think it is serving? Surly the aim cannot be the integrity or happiness of our families, which we have made subordinate to the education system, the television industry, and the consumer economy. Surely it cannot be the integrity of health of out communities, which we esteem even less than we esteem our families. Surly it cannot be love of our country, for we are far more concerned about the desecration of the flag than we are about the desecration of our land. Surly it cannot be the love of God, which counts for at least as little in the daily order of business as the love of family, community, and country.</span>
The "war on terrorism" is a HYBRID. ... Their violence is a legitimate action according to the war model. Problem: the U.S. has claimed that we can punish these enemies for plotting to harm us. In contrast, the LAW model allows us to punish someone, but if it's a "war," we are violating their rights in doing so. hope this helps
I think the answer is
- respect
-reconciliation
-honor
