Answer:
There were 2 primary types of government, a democracy, and a hierarchy. A hierarchy had a few different variants, the ruler had all power and was a god, the ruler controlled people, and the ruler had the most power but had a small house of other "government officials"
If I had a kingdom, it would have a democracy as its government. A group of advisors, the house/senate, and what many think is the ultimate power but has equal power, the president/king. Democracy is important. Not too much though, or else you get communism. Now, things were different back then. Most people kept what they had, and the citizens ran their own "government" of sorts. But a democratic government is still needed to control, and maintain the people. When I say control, I don't mean "give me all of your money and earnings and we will give you what you earned in food, water, clothes, and a house." That's communism. What I mean by control, is enforce the rules, make sure that the people don't tear each other apart, limb from limb. The people need guided to the decided way of living, which THEY CHOSE by voting. Therefore, they chose to follow these guidelines, and should not argue. That is how to run a stable government. On paper. Of course, there would be plenty of people who want to cause problems, but those things are too unpredictable to handle without communism. Not saying that it is the only way to run a government, what I meant was those things will be deal with at the time and can't be fixed on a simple word document for a history lesson on a computer learning system meant for a sixth grader to answer in a few sentences, about why you should be good to people, and not meant to go into detail about communism, and meant to see who understands how to live a happy human life, and who knows how to be the next "president" of Russia, and also just to see students creativity and knowledge of world politics as well as their downright opinion. I probably went into a lot of detail but hit the word limit.
Explanation:
hope this helps
<u>Japanese</u> mothers express disappointment and withdraw their love temporarily, resulting in the child feeling shame, a powerful inducement not to disobey again.
Japanese moms also are recognized for proactively predicting the wishes of their baby, making the prevention of fuss excessive precedence. Japanese moms are also with their children, almost usually, for the primary two years of lifestyle.
Whilst mother and father are disappointed in their youngsters, it's due to the fact they keep a hard and fast of expectancies that do not healthy the choice the child is making. At the same time, the mother and father are liable for how they do.
In Japan with the assistance of their mom, children begin, for an instance, putting on or starting up their clothes, eating, self-toileting, and enamel-brushing. Children at this age often show interest in doing these obligations by using themselves, and at such events, must be endorsed to finish them by myself.
Learn more about Japan here brainly.com/question/510537
#SPJ4
I think the answer is B because it says it in the passage on PLATO
Short answer C
A is wrong. The oil producing countries in the middle east do not have a manufacturing base.
B is also wrong. Saudi Arabia is the largest exporter of oil. There is no need for them to import any oil at all. They produce a very clean low content sulfur type of oil.
C is the answer <<<<< answer
