You want to isolate the x-term from the constant term, so you can subtract x/3 and add 10. This gives you
... 4/9x -10 -x/3 +10 > x/3 -12 -x/3 +10
... 1/9x > -2 . . . . . . collect terms
Now, you can multiply by 9 to see the condition on x.
... 9(1/9x) > -2(9)
... x > -18
On the x-y plane, the graph of this will be a dashed line at x=-18, and the half-plane to the right of that line will be shaded.
On a number line, there will be an open circle at x=-18, and the number line to the right of that circle will be marked (bold, colored, shaded, whatever).
Answer:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
A type I error occurs when you reject the null hypothesis when it is true. In this situation, a type I error occurs when you conclude on possible child neglect or abuse and place the child in protective custody
A type II error occurs when you accept the null hypothesis when it is false. In this instance, a type II error occurs when you conclude on no possible child abuse or neglect when there is and fail to remove the child from the home.
In this case, the type II error is the more serious error. Failure to remove the child when there is possible child abuse or neglect will lead to more detrimental effect. Although, the type I error is also serious, it is not so detrimental as the type II error.
I don't understand the question
Texaschic nailed it when saying that it's arithmetic
The recursive way to write this is to say
which tells us "start at 6 and each time subtract off 5"
The
portion is the nth term while
is the term just before the nth term
