All categories

3 years ago

Patrick payed $4.00 for 5 organic peaches. How much did he pay per peach?

Mathematics

1 answer:

RideAnS [48]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: 80 cents per organic peach

Step-by-step explanation: To find out how much Patrick paid for 5 organic peaches, we want to find the unit price for 1 peach.

Unit price means the cost per unit. In this case, the cost per peach. Since we know that it costs $4.00 for 5 peaches, to find the cost for 1 peach, we need to divide 5 into $4.00 or 5 into 4.00.

Now using long division, 5 divides into 40 eight times so we put an 8 above the second 0 and 8 x 5 is 40 and 40 - 40 is 0.

So 5 divides into 4.00 0.8 times which means that each peach costs 80 cents.

So the unit price is 80 cents per organic peach.

You might be interested in

What is the value of the expression (-5) -3?

ahrayia [7]

Answer:

Yezzir

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I NEED HELP IN QUESTION 4 AND 5 IF YOU KNOW HOW TO DO THIS PLEASEE HELP

Soloha48 [4]

Answer:

I'm in an elementary schools how I'm I suppose to know???? no answer

lolololo

4 0

3 years ago

Let event Aequalssubject is telling the truth and event Bequalspolygraph test indicates that the subject is lying. Use your own

pochemuha

Answer:

C is the right answer

Step-by-step explanation:

In this case we have the events

A: The subject is telling the truth.

B: The the polygraph indicates that the subject is lying

Recall that P(B|A) is defined as the probability that the event B occurs given that the event has already occurred, and is equals to P(B∩A)/P(A).

So, with the events we have defined, P(B|A) indicates the probability that the polygraph indicates lying given that the subject is actually telling the truth.

The most suitable answer is thus, C

3 0

4 years ago

PLEASE HELPPPPPP ASAPPP I WILL GIVE BRAINLEST FOR THE CORRECT ANSWER

guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

a. Find the multiples of 4 and 12 in the 30 to 40 range:

4 ⇒ 32, 36, 40

12 ⇒ 36

Answer = 36

b. Divisors of 24 ⇒ 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24

Answer = 3

3 is the only odd divisor.

c. Gcd = Greatest common divisor that isn't zero.

35 divisors ⇒ 1, 5, 7, 35

42 divisors ⇒ 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 14, 21, 42

Answer = 7

d. 98 divisors ⇒ 1,2,7,14,49,98

99 divisors ⇒ 1,3,9,11,33,99

Answer = 1

e. Answer = 25.

A number's greatest divisor is its own self.

6 0

3 years ago

PLS HELP! Will give 25 points!

RSB [31]

Answer and explanation:

Given: Belinda wants to invest $1,000. The table below shows the value of her investment under two different options for three different years:

Number of years 1 2 3

Option 1 (amount in dollars) 1100 1200 1300

Option 2 (amount in dollars) 1100 1210 1331

To find:

Part A: What type of function, linear or exponential, can be used to describe the value of the investment after a fixed number of years using option 1 and option 2?

Part B: Write one function for each option to describe the value of the investment f(n), in dollars, after n years.

Part C: Will there be any significant difference in the value of Belinda's investment after 20 years if she uses option 2 over option 1?

Solution:

Part A: Linear and exponential functions can be used to describe the value of the investment after a fixed number of years using option 1 and option 2, respectively.

Part B: (n=n+100) and (n=n+100x) are the functions for each option to describe the value of the investment f(n), in dollars, after n years.

Part C: Yes, there will be a significant difference of 1900 in the value of Belinda's investment after 20 years if she uses option 2 over option 1.

Part A:

In the case of option 1, the linear function can be used to describe the value of the investment after a fixed number of years. This is because, in option one, the amount increases by a fixed amount every year.

In the case of option 2, the exponential function can be used to describe the value of the investment after a fixed number of years. This is because, in option 2, the amount increase is higher than last year.

Part B:

For option 1, the function is

For option 2, the function is

Here, x is the increase in amount every consecutive year.

Part C:

After 20 years, the amount from option 1 would be 3000 and the amount from option 2 would be 4900. Thus, there is a difference between 1900.

Therefore,

Part A: Linear and exponential functions can be used to describe the value of the investment after a fixed number of years using option 1 and option 2, respectively.

Part B: (n=n+100) and (n=n+100x) are the functions for each option to describe the value of the investment f(n), in dollars, after n years.

Part C: Yes, there will be a significant difference of 1900 in the value of Belinda's investment after 20 years if she uses option 2 over option 1.

Hope this helps

8 0

2 years ago