Answer:
The correct answer will be the "proportion of firms with flexible prices".
Explanation:
- The sticky market or price mechanism induces on the upward steep slopes quantity supplied for the immediate term cumulative. That was because firms reacting to changes and differences in economic conditions are restrictive in fluctuating prices.
- We addressed the explanations or causes behind the strength and stiffness throughout this section.
So that the above is the correct solution.
Answer:
1)
![\left[\begin{array}{cccccc}$department&$salaries&OASDI&HI&SUTA&FUTA\\$office&22,760&1,411.12&341.4&280&42\\$sales&65,840&4,082.08&987.6&280&42\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccccc%7D%24department%26%24salaries%26OASDI%26HI%26SUTA%26FUTA%5C%5C%24office%2622%2C760%261%2C411.12%26341.4%26280%2642%5C%5C%24sales%2665%2C840%264%2C082.08%26987.6%26280%2642%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
2) payroll expense entries:
payroll expense 2063.14
Medicare payable 330.02
Social Security payable 1411.12
SUTA 280
FUTA 42
--------------------------------------------
payroll expense 5358.76
Medicare payable 954.68
Social Security payable 4082.08
SUTA 280
FUTA 42
Explanation:
We apply for each department the tax rate. Notice SUTA and FUTA have a ceilling of 7,000 so we do not apply the rate to the whole amoung but, for the 7,000 ceiling.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
i believe it could also be c
Answer: c. The median pay of economics majors increased more in dollar terms than any other majors in 2015.
Explanation:
According to research by several job websites, Economics majors saw their wages increase more than other majors in terms of dollar terms in 2015.
This has been attributed to the Economics field needing more specialization as most entry level economics jobs require at least a masters in the field. While there does not seem to be any reason for this, it is theorized that the need for Economists has been on the rise as economies become more uncertain.
Answer:
a) Product G should be produced and sold
b) Net financial advantage $80
Explanation:
<em>A company should process further a product if the additional revenue from the split-off point is greater than than the further processing cost. </em>
<em>Also note that all cost incurred up to the split-off point are irrelevant to the decision to process further . </em>
$
Revenue after split-off point
($9× 40 litres) 360
Revenue at the slit of point
($4 × 40) <u> (160)</u>
Additional income from further processing 200
Further processing cost ($3× 40) <u>(120)</u>
Incremental income from further processing <u> 80</u>
Incremental income from further processing = $80
a) The product F should be processed further and sold as product G. Doing so would increase the net income by $80.
b) Net advantage $80
