Answer:
The statement that proves to be true is that the researcher will not interact with the participants.
Explanation:
The reason to support the statement is because the researcher should not be conducting any behavior as he/ she wishes to find genuine types of interaction that may lead to the main goal which is to show cooperation between peers. If there was anything planned or spoken between peers and researcher, then the latter would not be ethic when going through the observation method to gather the information that is intended to be used.
I don't know much about diplomacy but this might help :)
<span>The functioning of diplomacy is influenced by a complicated combination of different interrelated factors. This paper briefly analyses their impact on the evolution of diplomacy and discusses how diplomacy as an instrument of good governance should adjust itself to meet the new challenges, to become more relevant, open and agile, to modify its methods and to fully utilize opportunities offered by the technological revolution.
</span>
Answer: D. They are always small groups composed of just a few people.
Explanation: Drug cartels are never composed of a few people. There is always a chain with a few people at the top of that chain.
Answer:
Highways
Explanation:
You are giving us 17 points not 30
plzzz brainliest
